🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <1992Dec16.235608.10172@dvorak.amd.com> rpomeroy@aunext1.amd.com  
(Ron Pomeroy x(Coop)) writes:
> In article <Dec16.161340.46031@yuma.ACNS.ColoState.EDU>  
> randall@redfish.atmos.colostate.edu (Dave Randall) writes:
> >>In article <1giql5INNo5@hamblin.math.byu.edu> bill@mathnx.math.byu.edu  
(Bill  
> >>Smith) writes:
> >>> Well, I'll pass another rumor on from a friend.  While the
> >>> 88110-flavor box has been dropped, another design based
> >>> on it appears to be the version they will release.  It has
> >>> a multiprocessing feature with plug-in sites for several
> >>> cpu's, you just have another plugged in if you want it.  The
> >>> alpha is not going to be the chip they use, it will also
> >>> not be P5. No waiting for 68060 either.  Not R4000-etc.
> >>> Not Sparc.  Not IBM.  Want to take a guess what's driving
> >>> it?  
> >>
> >>That leaves HP. Yippee!
> 
> Bzzzzzt
> 
> The 601 (PowerPC)
> --

The 601(s!) won't do multiprocessing without unreleased additional
hardware. You'd have to wait for the 620.

-Bill
--

       _ _|_______====___H____===_====_====_====_====_===____H___====_______ 
        |_______| [[[[        \###########||###########/         [[[[       |
  _______| [][] |____  """         UNION |  | PACIFIC        """            |
  |o ____|  UP  |__| \___________________|_ |____________________/\_________|| 
|_| /    |__74__|   \_|  |  |  |  |  |  ||  |  |  |  |  |  |  | /  \|   |  |||
|_|=|====|======|===|===\/=================================|=\/=|======|===|_|
|_|  [(o)=(o)=(o)=(o)]|_________________||________________[(o)=(o)=(o)=(o)]|_| 
==============================================================================
]    []    []    []    []    []    []    []    []    []    []    []    []   []
                           5000 H.P. Track Staightener