Article View: comp.sys.next.misc
Article #4480Re: 100 Mips Intel NeXT.
From: NLF102
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 1992 13:46
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 1992 13:46
14 lines
1365 bytes
1365 bytes
Okay, good point. Why replace the DSP when you don't have to. If removing it would lower the cost of the NeXT, then do it, but otherwise, sure, keep it there. Still a good idea to have a main processor fast enough to do all the jobs, just in case lightning strikes the DSP factory and burns it down or something. :D My other points still stand, though. I do have one other thing I'd like to add. I also wish that the chip they choose be one made here in America. We have enough of the computer manufacturing going to the Far East, let's not throw more wood on the fire. The more business we keep in America, the better we will be, I think. This is my last post here, until I either get another mainframe account on the PSU computers, or until I get a NeXT and connect to Internet. Thank you for the interesting posts and lively debates. Nate :)
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<92353.084626NLF102@psuvm.psu.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!usc!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!spool.mu.edu!uwm.edu!psuvax1!psuvm!nlf102References:
<1992Dec13.211119.22172@qb.rhein-main.de> <1992Dec16.150405.613@pencom.com> <92352.110046NLF102@psuvm.psu.edu> <1992Dec17.193504.24815@blaze.cs.jhu.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!usc!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!spool.mu.edu!uwm.edu!psuvax1!psuvm!nlf102 Organization: Penn State University Date: Fri, 18 Dec 1992 08:46:26 EST From: <NLF102@psuvm.psu.edu> Message-ID: <92353.084626NLF102@psuvm.psu.edu> Newsgroups: comp.sys.next.misc Subject: Re: 100 Mips Intel NeXT. References: <1992Dec13.211119.22172@qb.rhein-main.de> <1992Dec16.150405.613@pencom.com> <92352.110046NLF102@psuvm.psu.edu> <1992Dec17.193504.24815@blaze.cs.jhu.edu> Lines: 14