Thread View: comp.sys.next.misc
1 messages
1 total messages
Started by Michael McCulloch
Mon, 04 Jan 1993 05:27
Re: RS/6000 and NeXT Machines
Author: Michael McCulloch
Date: Mon, 04 Jan 1993 05:27
Date: Mon, 04 Jan 1993 05:27
44 lines
2730 bytes
2730 bytes
henrich@crh.cl.msu.edu (Charles Henrich) writes: > >duca@binah.cc.brandeis.edu (Karen Duca, a.k.a. Rocky) writes: > >>My group is considering getting a NeXT as a client machine for an RS/6000. >>Seeing as the RS has been such a "delight" to use since we got it several >>months ago, I want to make sure that this mating is compatible before we >>go ahead. Any suggestions from people who are working with these two >>machines now? What software is the best for running X-Windows on the NeXT? > > >The next is the *worse* machine in the world to do Xwindows on. (IMHO). >Your better off going with something like the Sun ELC, or Sun Classic. The >reasons for NeXT doing a bad job are fairly straightforward, first of all >the mouse is only two buttons, secondly the resolution of a NeXT is much >less than a Sun doing X. > >My experiences are with the PD X implementation and Co-Xist > I strongly disagree with the answer given by Charles above. IMHO this info is outdated. Anyway, the real information requested regards the _performance_ and _compatibility_ of X on a NeXT. I recently took advantage of the demo offering for Cub'X Windows on the NeXT, and was pleasanlty surprised at both the speed of display and interoperation with other X machines (we use SGIs as our main servers). Cub'X is plently fast (comparable with our 486s with ISA accelerators) and has had no problem with 8-bit pseudo colormaps with our main application (Patran). As far as the third mouse button, Cub'X allows the use of the ALT key as a modifier to get the third mouse button -- which I think works fine. I use a 25 MHz Colorstation with 32 MB of RAM. I don't understand the above comment on resolution -- unless 1280x1024 is what Charles is used to. I really think the days of unacceptable, even pathetic, X performance on the NeXT are over. Check out Cub'X and/or the new, speedier Co-Xist 3.0. If you like the NeXT for things other than just X, then I think the NeXT will work fine for most things. CPU performance aside (that's a rather important aside I admit) the NeXT works very acceptably as an X-terminal, IMHO. Of course, if you desire to customize your X environment, be prepared to delve deeply into several X configurations files as usual... Michael McCulloch Huntsville, AL
Thread Navigation
This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.
Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.
Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.
Back to All Threads