Re: Distributed Objects Experiment - Results - Article 1515 - go-pugleaf

Article View: comp.sys.next.programmer

Article #1515

Back to comp.sys.next.programmer Previous Next

Re: Distributed Objects Experiment - Results

#1515

From: Christopher Songer
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 1992 16:24

15 lines
1095 bytes

In article <1992Oct14.052047.7056@cubetech.com> andrew@cubetech.com writes:
>
>Distributed Objects take all of the pain out of writing distributed or
>client/server apps. 
>

I agree with this completely! Distributed Objects seem to be the best
feature to 3.0 that I have seen. They are completely amazing. For
slight changes in your code structure, you can make your work
distributed and available.

However, I would comment that the documentation for threaded Servers 
under 3.0 looks terrible!

-Chris

Technical Details

Message-ID: <1992Oct15.162455.152791@lexmark.com>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!think.com!ames!tulane!ukma!lexmark!songer

References: <1992Oct14.052047.7056@cubetech.com>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Newsgroups: comp.sys.next.programmer,comp.sys.next.sysadmin,comp.sys.next.misc
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!think.com!ames!tulane!ukma!lexmark!songer
From: songer@lexmark.com (Christopher Songer)
Subject: Re: Distributed Objects Experiment - Results
Message-ID: <1992Oct15.162455.152791@lexmark.com>
X-Disclaimer: These views are the poster's and not necessarily those of Lexmark
Sender: usenet@lexmark.com (News Dude)
Nntp-Posting-Host: 9.51.7.57
Organization: Lexington, KY
References: <1992Oct14.052047.7056@cubetech.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 1992 16:24:55 GMT
Lines: 16

Reply to Parent Message