Thread View: comp.sys.next.programmer
2 messages
2 total messages
Started by Peter Kocks
Tue, 24 Nov 1992 02:10
gcc 2.3.1 on NeXTStep 3.0 ????
Author: Peter Kocks
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 1992 02:10
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 1992 02:10
11 lines
781 bytes
781 bytes
Has gcc 2.3.1 been compiled successfully on NeXT 3.0 ?? If so, could someone please summarize and post (and maybe put in the FAQ). I got gcc 2.2.2 to compile on NeXT 2.0 fairly easily, I hope the new updates do not make it too difficult. Incidentally, what's the latest version of gdb and has it been ported? --Peter Kocks kocks@chemistry.stanford.edu
Re: gcc 2.3.1 on NeXTStep 3.0 ????
Author: Michael Glenn
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 1992 05:20
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 1992 05:20
23 lines
1366 bytes
1366 bytes
In article <1992Nov24.021056.22646@leland.Stanford.EDU> kocks@leland.Stanford.EDU (Peter Kocks) writes: > Has gcc 2.3.1 been compiled successfully on NeXT 3.0 ?? > > If so, could someone please summarize and post (and maybe > put in the FAQ). I got gcc 2.2.2 to compile on NeXT 2.0 > fairly easily, I hope the new updates do not make it too difficult. > > Incidentally, what's the latest version of gdb and has it > been ported? > > --Peter Kocks > kocks@chemistry.stanford.edu gcc 2.3.1 compiled fine for me under 3.0, with one small hitch. The header file /usr/include/ansi/m68k/stdarg.h had two lines (line 4 and line 7) that were commented using // rather than /* */. After changing this, there were no problems. I find it doesn't seem to compile everything, and some things it gives gobs and gobs of new warnings... fermat@fermat.dartmouth.edu (NeXTmail ok)
Thread Navigation
This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.
Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.
Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.
Back to All Threads