🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Thread View: comp.sys.next.programmer
2 messages
2 total messages Started by Peter Kocks Tue, 24 Nov 1992 02:10
gcc 2.3.1 on NeXTStep 3.0 ????
#1906
Author: Peter Kocks
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 1992 02:10
11 lines
781 bytes
Has gcc 2.3.1 been compiled successfully on NeXT 3.0 ??

If so, could someone please summarize and post (and maybe 
put in the FAQ).  I got gcc 2.2.2 to compile on NeXT 2.0
fairly easily, I hope the new updates do not make it too difficult.

Incidentally, what's the latest version of gdb and has it
been ported?

--Peter Kocks
  kocks@chemistry.stanford.edu
Re: gcc 2.3.1 on NeXTStep 3.0 ????
#1910
Author: Michael Glenn
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 1992 05:20
23 lines
1366 bytes
In article <1992Nov24.021056.22646@leland.Stanford.EDU>  
kocks@leland.Stanford.EDU (Peter Kocks) writes:
> Has gcc 2.3.1 been compiled successfully on NeXT 3.0 ??
> 
> If so, could someone please summarize and post (and maybe 
> put in the FAQ).  I got gcc 2.2.2 to compile on NeXT 2.0
> fairly easily, I hope the new updates do not make it too difficult.
> 
> Incidentally, what's the latest version of gdb and has it
> been ported?
> 
> --Peter Kocks
>   kocks@chemistry.stanford.edu

gcc 2.3.1 compiled fine for me under 3.0, with one small hitch.  The  
header file /usr/include/ansi/m68k/stdarg.h had two lines (line 4 and line  
7) that were commented using // rather than /* */.  After changing this,  
there were no problems.

I find it doesn't seem to compile everything, and some things it gives  
gobs and gobs of new warnings...

fermat@fermat.dartmouth.edu (NeXTmail ok)
Thread Navigation

This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.

Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.

Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.

Back to All Threads