🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <1992Sep20.172948.8838@ni.umd.edu> louie@sayshell.umd.edu  
(Louis A. Mamakos) writes:
> In article <1992Sep18.230453.1144@cube.handheld.com>  
jmd@cube.handheld.com (Jim De Arras) writes:
> I dunno.  This isn't one of those cases where its worth tracking down
> bugs in NeXT's software when you have superior alternatives available.
> I just run the latest IDA-foo sendmail on my system, and it works just
> fine.  (Both with 2.1 and 3.0.)  It doesn't handle aliases which are
> shoved into Netinfo, but this is a feature, not a bug as far as I'm
> concerned.  Aliases in /etc/sendmail/aliases works fine.  I'm running
> something which identifies itself as "5.65c/IDA-1.4.4".
> 
> I'm pretty surprised that NeXT doesn't just ship a real IDA-enhanced
> sendmail with real working sendmail.cf files.  Especially since
> Lennart Lovstrand, who did quite a bit with IDA-sendmail, now works
> for NeXT.
Why do you still use sendmail which (nearly?) noone can configure. I use  
smail3.1.25 which I enhanced to handle netinfo-aliases. I tried to mail my  
announcment to the address the author mentions in the doc's but got no  
responds yet. I can upload the stuff to some ftp-side or mail it somebody.  
Anyone interested ? 

Verified for 2.1
Not tested yet for 3.0 (but should be no problem).