Article View: comp.sys.next.software
Article #299Re: Copy Protection (was: Re: WordPerfect Update (NOT!))
From: kdyer Kristin Dyer
Date: Wed, 05 Aug 1992 22:32
Date: Wed, 05 Aug 1992 22:32
49 lines
2807 bytes
2807 bytes
David Lemson writes
sears@tree.egr.uh.edu (Paul S. Sears) writes:
>I like the ability to limit software to specific machines (not to
a specific
Did you set it up? Sure, it's fine once it's running but to set up
50 of them is quite a bit of work.
>of limiting software much more than "There are already 4 copies of
this
>software running...." type messages...
But with mathematica's floating license server, which supposedly
works now, you should have one copy for each machine anyhow, so you
should never have anyone see such a message, plus you don't have to
run mathinfo on each machine. I think that license servers which
are tied down to one machine are reasonable.
>Wolfram has done a great job in dealing with us and they usually have
our
>passwords within 24 hours of requesting them (often the same day!).
i get the distinct sense from these schemes that people assume that every
office that uses software has a 7 day a week sysadmin that works during regular
hours. or that my convienint time to install a program, late afternoon,
corresponds with regular working hours for a company on the east coast.
the fact is, once i go to install a program, 24 hours is frequently not an
option. somebody wants to see that program and use it NOW. every release, every
update seems to require a new key, machines get moved around, upgraded or sent
home in a constantly changing office landscape. these kinds of licenses
actually deter us from looking at or using products because of the hassle
involved. i want to peek at a particular product, but i can't because it is
installed on so-and-so's machine because he was doing the review. or because
they need that software for day to day operations.
while i was originally impressed with the security afforded by these schemes,
my disgust with the hassle involved has practically come to a personal boycott.
--
Kristin Dyer kdyer@nextworld.com
Assistant Editor 501 Second Street
NeXTWORLD Magazine San Francisco, CA 94107
We always thought 'NeXT' stood for 'Nobody enjoys X-Windows Tedium'.. - Gregory
H. Anderson
--
Kristin Dyer kdyer@nextworld.com
Assistant Editor 501 Second Street
NeXTWORLD Magazine San Francisco, CA 94107
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Aug5.223201.1830@nextworld.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!nextworld.com!kdyerReferences:
<BsHF8t.2Ap@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: comp.sys.next.software Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!nextworld.com!kdyer From: kdyer (Kristin Dyer) Subject: Re: Copy Protection (was: Re: WordPerfect Update (NOT!)) Message-ID: <1992Aug5.223201.1830@nextworld.com> Sender: kdyer@nextworld.com Organization: NeXTWORLD Magazine References: <BsHF8t.2Ap@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu> Date: Wed, 5 Aug 1992 22:32:01 GMT Lines: 49