Re: SoftPC 2.0 or 3.0

Article View: comp.sys.next.software

Article #352

Back to comp.sys.next.software Previous Next

#352

From: Jim De Arras
Date: Sun, 09 Aug 1992 16:30

15 lines
976 bytes

In article <1992Aug8.045901.9569@utstat.uucp> philip@utstat.uucp (Philip  
McDunnough) writes:
> In article <1992Aug7.195056.15533@almserv.uucp> rmcghee@fnma.com writes:
> >I am looking for experiences with SoftPC and MS Windows.  What programs
> >have been tested?  What'ya think?
> 
> Windows under SoftPC on the NeXT is not usable. You can install it, but 
> you would not be content with its crawling, slow , slow speed.
>  
> Philip McDunnough
> philip@utstat.toronto.edu
> 
The same can be said of Windoze installed on ANY platform! ;-)

Jim

Technical Details

Message-ID: <1992Aug9.163056.12390@cube.handheld.com>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!dtix!darwin.sura.net!uvaarpa!clem!news

References: <1992Aug8.045901.9569@utstat.uucp>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!dtix!darwin.sura.net!uvaarpa!clem!news
From: jmd@cube.handheld.com (Jim De Arras)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.next.software
Subject: Re: SoftPC 2.0 or 3.0
Message-ID: <1992Aug9.163056.12390@cube.handheld.com>
Date: 9 Aug 92 16:30:56 GMT
References: <1992Aug8.045901.9569@utstat.uucp>
Sender: news@cube.handheld.com
Organization: Hand Held Products, Inc.
Lines: 15
Nntp-Posting-Host: dale

Reply to Parent Message