Article View: comp.sys.next.software
Article #566Re: Not (was: NeXT Ships NeXTSTEP Release 3.0)
From: Geoff Brunkhorst
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 1992 17:38
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 1992 17:38
44 lines
2914 bytes
2914 bytes
In article <60246@mimsy.umd.edu> alex@cs.umd.edu (Alex Blakemore) writes: > I was told Wednesday by a supervisor in the orders dept at NeXT that > the good news was that 3.0 was shipping (I had that it had stopped) and > that the stoppage had something to do with the license agreement that > was now resolved. > > So it is possible that: > the 3.0 shipping delay is old news that just reached the net and > that it is now finally shipping. just after I was told this, NeXT 3.0 > press releases appeared on the net. Well, let's get this in ascending date order. My original post was after a phone call to the shipper Thursday morning, Sept 10, 1992. It appears that NeXT had yet to tell the shipper about such 'good' news. At this point, I tend to believe the shipper more than NeXT. Even if it is old news, it is false advertising to claim one thing and do another. This is not good for NeXT, who in the past has been beaten up on it's sales totals being unreliable. NeXT does owe the 'waiting faithful' an explanation why 2nd Day air shipments are taking at least 2 weeks or more for the majority of their customers. I, like Art, have a small but critical project, waiting for 3.0 deployment. I waited a week for 3.0, causing my user base a loss of a weeks productivity, thinking I could save me and them the pain of 'upgrade' (these users are new to the NeXT platform). Now I have lost that week, and I will lose another week installing 3.0 at our remote (like 1000's of miles away) sites, most likely later next month. Mine is only a time/materials loss, but my guess is guys like Art and other small developers/VARs etc are really hurt by this in terms of money in their pocket. For what I can tell, these are the people that really 'sell' NeXT to the new markets, and causing them loss will likely come back and cause NeXT loss. Finally, most academic computing facilities I know try to avoid systems upgrades during the school year. This may cause 3.0 to sit on the shelf until quarter/semester break. More bad press, in one of NeXT's strategic markets. -geoff --------------------------------------------------------------- Geoffrey Brunkhorst, RCF brunkhorst@Mayo.edu Guggenheim 10 (507) 284-1805 Mayo Foundation, Rochester MN, 55905 USA fax (507) 284-5231
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Sep11.173850.14879@bmw.mayo.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!europa.asd.contel.com!darwin.sura.net!spool.mu.edu!umn.edu!bru!newsmanReferences:
<60246@mimsy.umd.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: comp.sys.next.software Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!europa.asd.contel.com!darwin.sura.net!spool.mu.edu!umn.edu!bru!newsman From: brunkhorst@mayo.edu (Geoff Brunkhorst) Subject: Re: Not (was: NeXT Ships NeXTSTEP Release 3.0) Message-ID: <1992Sep11.173850.14879@bmw.mayo.edu> Sender: newsman@bmw.mayo.edu (/home/bmw/usenet) Reply-To: brunkhorst@mayo.edu Organization: Mayo Foundation, Rochester MN. Campus References: <60246@mimsy.umd.edu> Date: Fri, 11 Sep 92 17:38:50 GMT Lines: 44