What's up with the "undo" command ?

Thread View: comp.sys.next.software

2 messages

[T] Back to Threads [V] Tree View [G] Group Articles

2 total messages Started by Peer Landa Tue, 03 Nov 1992 17:11

#131

Author: Peer Landa
Date: Tue, 03 Nov 1992 17:11

7 lines
719 bytes

The "undo" command doesn't work while using Edit, Mail and NewsGrazer in 3.0 ??   
Is it just me, or is this something everyone knows about and think is fine ?!   
In the good old 2.0 days, Edit was my favorite text-editor, (did even use it  
for wordprocessing . .) ..

-- peer

Re: What's up with the "undo" command ?

#865

Author: Gordon Van Huizen
Date: Wed, 04 Nov 1992 20:04

26 lines
1525 bytes

In article <1992Nov3.171119.28740@leland.Stanford.EDU>  
peer@ccrma.stanford.edu (Peer Landa) writes:
> 
> The "undo" command doesn't work while using Edit, Mail and NewsGrazer in  
3.0 ??   
> Is it just me, or is this something everyone knows about and think is  
fine ?!   
> In the good old 2.0 days, Edit was my favorite text-editor, (did even  
use it  
> for wordprocessing . .) ..
> 

Well, undo in Edit has always been an "undelete" (which never thrilled me  
actually), and the NEXTSTEP 3.0 Edit has it labelled accordingly, along  
with removing command-Z.

I actually favor the change as I habitually command-Z to REALLY undo  
something and have on several ocassions been very badly screwed when the  
undelete occured...

Gordon
-- 
----------------------------------------------------------------
Gordon Van Huizen           vox: 619.488.9411  fax: 619.488.3045
Metrosoft                   gvh@metrosoft.com [NeXTmail welcome]
----------------------------------------------------------------

Thread Navigation

This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.

Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.

Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.

Back to All Threads