Re: NeXTstep 3.0 and an 030 Cube

Article View: comp.sys.next.sysadmin

Article #2206

Back to comp.sys.next.sysadmin Previous Next

#2206

From: edwin.jimenez
Date: Tue, 05 Jan 1993 00:15

11 lines
998 bytes

Oh, it works fine, fine. And slow compared to what? Probably the configuration
mentioned before (Printer and OD server) is stripped of memory. True, there
were some pre-release 3.0 versions that were unusable but what comes in
CD-ROM is perfectly fine if you just install it and compare against the same
system you had before, i.e., an 030 not a 040. I've been using the beta version
and then the released version since early summer without problems, without
"noticing" a performance hit either. Configuration: 030, mono cube, 24MB,
and 600MB disk.

Edwin

Technical Details

Message-ID: <1993Jan5.001521.4748@cbnewse.cb.att.com>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!pacific.mps.ohio-state.edu!linac!att!cbnewse!edwin

References: <1hvbppINNfr@au-ns.american.edu> <1993Jan4.105137.6841@cubx.fdn.org>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Newsgroups: comp.sys.next.sysadmin
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!pacific.mps.ohio-state.edu!linac!att!cbnewse!edwin
From: edwin@cbnewse.cb.att.com (edwin.jimenez)
Subject: Re: NeXTstep 3.0 and an 030 Cube
Organization: AT&T
Date: Tue, 5 Jan 1993 00:15:21 GMT
Message-ID: <1993Jan5.001521.4748@cbnewse.cb.att.com>
References: <1hvbppINNfr@au-ns.american.edu> <1993Jan4.105137.6841@cubx.fdn.org>
Lines: 11

Reply to Parent Message