🚀 go-pugleaf

wierda@ltb.ltb.bso.nl (Gerben Wierda) writes:
>It does 3/64. Can I make it do 7/128? (I'd rather not try something above 128
>since BSD has 128 max hard coded in).

I don't think so. Try using Taylor UUCP1.03 - it comes with the
complete source and with the taylor config files, you can tune every
parameter without recompiling.
-- 
Heiko W.Rupp  Gerwigstr.5  7500 Kh'e 1  hwr@pilhuhn.ka.sub.org  +49 721 693642
You mean you don't want to watch WRESTLING from ATLANTA?

In article <2222@ltb.ltb.bso.nl> wierda@ltb.ltb.bso.nl (Gerben Wierda)  
writes:
> It does 3/64. Can I make it do 7/128? (I'd rather not try something  
above 128
> since BSD has 128 max hard coded in).

Get beyond all those silly limits. Use Taylor UUCP. Ian Taylor is about to  
release a new version 1.04 which support a UUCP-i protocol (bidirectional,  
16 packets in window size and a packetsize of 1K).

You can also tell Taylor UUCP to use the g-protocol with a packetsize up  
to 4K and windowsize up to 7!

And it's fast!!!

I'm running a main HUP with 8 nodes below me, and all the transferrates  
was close to 3 times higer after we started to use Taylor UUCP!

It is easy to configuere and easy to compile (if you change /usr/include  
back to what it should be)

Tell me if you need more help,
Karsten,
-- 
Karsten Thygesen (karthy@dannug.dk) (NeXT-Mail welcome)
Danish NeXT Users Group
Phone: +45 98 12 42 59
Aalborg, Denmark.

In article <2222@ltb.ltb.bso.nl> wierda@ltb.ltb.bso.nl (Gerben Wierda) writes:
>It does 3/64. Can I make it do 7/128? (I'd rather not try something above 128
>since BSD has 128 max hard coded in).

Use TaylorUUCP.  Does everything from 3/64 to 7/4096.  Way better than
the ancient stuff NeXT ships.

Didn't you used to use Taylor??


andrew
-- 
andrew@cubetech.com     | "We shall not cease from exploration
Andrew Loewenstern      |  And the end of our exploring
Cube Technologies, Inc. |  Will be to arrive where we started
                        |  And know the place for the first time." -T.S. Eliot

In article <2222@ltb.ltb.bso.nl> wierda@ltb.ltb.bso.nl (Gerben Wierda) writes:
> It does 3/64. Can I make it do 7/128? (I'd rather not try something above 128
> since BSD has 128 max hard coded in).

Why don't you use Taylor-UUCP (from GNU sites) ? Much better than the simple  
NeXT-UUCP and can be configured everything you can imagine

-- 
------------------------------------------------------------------
Thomas Funke  ** E-mail: thf@zelator.in-berlin.de
NeXT-Developer * Unix-Consultant
------------------------------------------------------------------

karthy@dannug.dk (Karsten Thygesen) writes:

>Get beyond all those silly limits. Use Taylor UUCP. Ian Taylor is about to  
>release a new version 1.04 which support a UUCP-i protocol (bidirectional,  

Beware: 1.04 is still a (more or les) buggy beta! 1.03 Runs perfectly
if the NeXT-patch is applied.
-- 
Heiko W.Rupp  Gerwigstr.5  7500 Kh'e 1  hwr@pilhuhn.ka.sub.org  +49 721 693642
BELA LUGOSI is my co-pilot..

In article <2222@ltb.ltb.bso.nl> wierda@ltb.ltb.bso.nl (Gerben Wierda)  
writes:
> It does 3/64. Can I make it do 7/128? (I'd rather not try something  
above 128
> since BSD has 128 max hard coded in).
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> 
> -- 
Compile Taylor UUCP package. It's a GNU package doing anything you can  
expect from a healthy uucp implementation. You should get version 1.03 or  
version 1.04 from gnu.ai.mit.edu. (The latter version is under beta  
testing but has more interesting features).

Version 1.03 needs a patch to work with NextStep. You may want to  
subscribe to the taylor-uucp mailing list (taylor-uucp@gnu.ai.mit.edu) and  
ask for fresh news about it.

Please mail to me if you have more questions.
-- 
----
Benoit Grange - PARIS - FRANCE

Mail to : ben@fizz.fdn.org (SMALL NeXTMails accepted, < 10kb)