Re: Re: NS32000 Processor

Article View: comp.sys.nsc.32k

Article #1126

#1126

From: Clif Purkiser
Date: Wed, 10 Jun 1987 17:33

22 lines
1272 bytes

> 
> 	Great blurb on the 32k, why'd you leave us big endder's out tho?
> 	32032's power two different parallel processing powerhouses:
> 
> 	Encore Mutimax series
> 	Sequent  (I think)
> 
> 	Wonder why the 32k was chosen to be the base unit in multi processor
> 	computer's? Probably because the other's couldn't handle the job!

	It seems that Sequent has seen the light and switched processors
for their next generation product.  The reason they switched wasn't
because the 386 good run MS-DOS it was because it was faster.  


-- 
Clif Purkiser, Intel, Santa Clara, Ca.
{pur-ee,hplabs,amd,scgvaxd,dual,idi,omsvax}!intelca!clif

These views are my own property.  However anyone who wants them can have 
them for a nominal fee.

Technical Details

Message-ID: <3479@intelca.UUCP>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!seismo!rutgers!sri-spam!ames!amdahl!oliveb!intelca!clif

References: <266@udcps1.UUCP> <642@umnd-cs.D.UMN.EDU>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!seismo!rutgers!sri-spam!ames!amdahl!oliveb!intelca!clif
From: clif@intelca.UUCP (Clif Purkiser)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.nsc.32k
Subject: Re: Re: NS32000 Processor
Message-ID: <3479@intelca.UUCP>
Date: Wed, 10-Jun-87 13:33:57 EDT
Article-I.D.: intelca.3479
Posted: Wed Jun 10 13:33:57 1987
Date-Received: Sat, 20-Jun-87 04:26:08 EDT
References: <266@udcps1.UUCP> <642@umnd-cs.D.UMN.EDU>
Organization: Intel, Santa Clara, Ca.
Lines: 22

Reply to Parent Message