Article View: comp.sys.powerpc
Article #1797Re: Debate: PowerMac "trounces" Pentium....???
From: Andrew Chang
Date: Tue, 29 Aug 1995 05:42
Date: Tue, 29 Aug 1995 05:42
13 lines
1101 bytes
1101 bytes
Alan Lovejoy <lovejoya@ix.netcom.com> wrote: > >One way to catalyze a change from WinDOS to some worthy rival would be >a performance advantage of 4 to 1, price parity, and a reasonable >supply of the high-quality apps for the competing OS. > >The PowerPC meets 3 out of the 4 requirements already. It may achieve >the final one in the post-604/620 generation--about mid 1997. Out of curiousity, what is the fourth requirement? By my count, you listed three. Andrew
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<41u9ba$ar1@berlin.infomatch.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!berlin.infomatch.com!arcReferences:
<3tmppr$8ck@cville-srv.wam.umd.edu> <3vlorg$kq3@steel.interlog.com> <DDwHG2.G9H@dorsai.org> <41o2a8$72v@ixnews5.ix.netcom.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!berlin.infomatch.com!arc From: arc@infomatch.com (Andrew Chang) Newsgroups: comp.sys.powerpc,comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.sys.mac.advocacy,comp.os.os2.advocacy,comp.sys.amiga.advocacy,comp.sys.intel,alt.2600 Subject: Re: Debate: PowerMac "trounces" Pentium....??? Date: 29 Aug 1995 05:42:02 GMT Organization: Infomatch Communications Message-ID: <41u9ba$ar1@berlin.infomatch.com> References: <3tmppr$8ck@cville-srv.wam.umd.edu> <3vlorg$kq3@steel.interlog.com> <DDwHG2.G9H@dorsai.org> <41o2a8$72v@ixnews5.ix.netcom.com> Reply-To: andrewc@ugcs.caltech.edu NNTP-Posting-Host: matrix.infomatch.com