Re: Macintosh Resource Forks and the BeBox

Article View: comp.sys.powerpc

Article #2519

#2519

From: BDZ25
Date: Mon, 30 Oct 1995 08:28

6 lines
713 bytes

A better idea than Apple's forked file system is the NEXTSTEP app-wrapper
format.  It is much more flexible and uses the native NEXTSTEP file
system, unlike the Apple approach which creates a file system within a
file system.

-Rob

Technical Details

Message-ID: <4722c9$enr@newsbf02.news.aol.com>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!newsbf02.news.aol.com!not-for-mail

References: <47177v$hro@news.isc.rit.edu>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!newsbf02.news.aol.com!not-for-mail
From: bdz25@aol.com (BDZ25)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.powerpc,comp.sys.amiga.programmer,comp.sys.amiga.advocacy,comp.sys.mac.advocacy
Subject: Re: Macintosh Resource Forks and the BeBox
Date: 30 Oct 1995 03:28:57 -0500
Organization: America Online, Inc. (1-800-827-6364)
Sender: root@newsbf02.news.aol.com
Message-ID: <4722c9$enr@newsbf02.news.aol.com>
References: <47177v$hro@news.isc.rit.edu>
Reply-To: bdz25@aol.com (BDZ25)

Reply to Parent Message