🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <314523CE.5A79@mts.se>, Martin Nisshagen <martin@mts.se> wrote:


>>Stability of NT? I have under one and a half year *never* had even a single
>crash or lockup of it. In that time I did have one total crash of a Solaris 
>machine. I would say that NT is as stable as VMS is.

That's probably because who've been limited to 4 applications for 1.5 years.

>Anyway VMS, NT, Unix, OS/2, Win95 has much better stability than any version
>of your MacOS. NO doubt about that.


VMS  : Yes
NT   : Yes
Unix : Yes
OS/2 : Yes
Win95: ARE YOU KIDDING!!!???

Do you really know much about various versions of the MacOS and their
relative stability?

If you run a clean System (minimal shareware extensions), the MacOS is
pretty stable (some OS versions more than others).

The MacOS is not as stable as NT or Unix,... but Win95 crashes ALL THE
TIME (much like a Mac can do if people go crazy with inits).  But to say
that it has "much better stability than any version of [your] MacOS" is
pretty foolish.

-- 
 ____________________________________
/                                    \  Most problems could be solved
| Mark A. Decker                     |  with one solution.
| madecker@lorien.creol.ucf.edu      |
|                                    |  More humans need to die.
| http://www.creol.ucf.edu/~madecker |  (ofcourse getting rid of the 
\____________________________________/   scum first)