Article View: comp.sys.powerpc
Article #538Re: Ask yourself these before you choosing a 32bit OS...
From: Jim Williams
Date: Fri, 04 Aug 1995 23:08
Date: Fri, 04 Aug 1995 23:08
18 lines
1410 bytes
1410 bytes
daveacg@interlog.com (Dave Glue) wrote: > >The first version of 95 released is already _far_ more stable and >reliable than the most tweaked Win3.1/WFWG configuration out there. >If users can stick with 3.1 and its faults, but avoid 95 because >there's not a ".1" after it, that's a ridiculous decision. You will >have a far more stable and productive environment than the 3.1 you're >used to. > To the extent I'm still using Windoze I'll stick with 3.1 for the simple reason than I'm evolving off it. -- Jim Williams. Find a Linux/GNU User Group near you: http://www.tiac.net/users/williams/lugnuts/
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<3vu99j$hom@sundog.tiac.net>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sundog.tiac.net!usenetReferences:
<3vh2hc$9dd@falcon.ccs.uwo.ca> <3vhabl$b8l@steel.interlog.com> <3vlrod$19fj@sat.ipp-garching.mpg.de> <n618mq9V5IUS075yn@oslonett.no> <3vu47o$psu@steel.interlog.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sundog.tiac.net!usenet From: Jim Williams <williams@tiac.net> Newsgroups: comp.sys.powerpc,comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.sys.mac.advocacy,comp.os.os2.advocacy,comp.sys.amiga.advocacy,comp.sys.intel,alt.2600,alt.destroy.microsoft,comp.os.ms-windows.advocacy Subject: Re: Ask yourself these before you choosing a 32bit OS... Date: 4 Aug 1995 23:08:35 GMT Organization: Elision Message-ID: <3vu99j$hom@sundog.tiac.net> References: <3vh2hc$9dd@falcon.ccs.uwo.ca> <3vhabl$b8l@steel.interlog.com> <3vlrod$19fj@sat.ipp-garching.mpg.de> <n618mq9V5IUS075yn@oslonett.no> <3vu47o$psu@steel.interlog.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: elision.tiac.net Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Mozilla 1.1N (Windows; I; 16bit)