Re: Ask yourself these before you choosing a 32bit OS...

Article View: comp.sys.powerpc

Article #539

#539

From: Inconnu
Date: Fri, 04 Aug 1995 23:29

23 lines
1489 bytes

In article <3vu47o$psu@steel.interlog.com>,
Dave Glue <daveacg@interlog.com> wrote:

>The fact is, 95 is an evolutionary, not revolutionary, step up from
>Windows.  Because of this, it's incomparable to a brand-new OS written
>from the ground up.

Yeah, right.  
Spoon-fed by Microsoft-- why don't you read up on Win95??  There is almost
nothing new that wasn't there in WfW3.11-- it looks different; they renamed
MSDOS.SYS and you think it's a new system.  It's a lot more stable because
it relies on V86 a lot more, but it's nothing new.

>That doesn't mean 95 won't have bugs- just that its "bugs" are far
>less severe than 3.1's major architectural flaws.

True, MS has gone to great extents to beta-test this; I wish every 
developer would do this.

-- 
    -INK <kellcrai@isuux.isu.edu>
         Idaho State University

Technical Details

Message-ID: <3vuahe$bde@cwis.isu.edu>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!cwis.isu.edu!not-for-mail

References:

<3vh2hc$9dd@falcon.ccs.uwo.ca> <3vlrod$19fj@sat.ipp-garching.mpg.de> <n618mq9V5IUS075yn@oslonett.no> <3vu47o$psu@steel.interlog.com>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!cwis.isu.edu!not-for-mail
From: kellcrai@cwis.isu.edu (Inconnu)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.powerpc,comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.sys.mac.advocacy,comp.os.os2.advocacy,comp.sys.amiga.advocacy,comp.sys.intel,alt.2600,alt.destroy.microsoft,comp.os.ms-windows.advocacy
Subject: Re: Ask yourself these before you choosing a 32bit OS...
Date: 4 Aug 1995 17:29:50 -0600
Organization: Idaho State University, Pocatello
Message-ID: <3vuahe$bde@cwis.isu.edu>
References: <3vh2hc$9dd@falcon.ccs.uwo.ca> <3vlrod$19fj@sat.ipp-garching.mpg.de> <n618mq9V5IUS075yn@oslonett.no> <3vu47o$psu@steel.interlog.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.isu.edu

Reply to Parent Message