Article View: comp.sys.powerpc
Article #700Re: Debate: PowerMac "trounces" Pentium....???
From: Mindless Cynic
Date: Sun, 06 Aug 1995 21:29
Date: Sun, 06 Aug 1995 21:29
61 lines
3577 bytes
3577 bytes
gato@freud.inst.com (gato) wrote: >: Infoworld-- PowerMac is almost 2x Pentium speed. >: PCWeek (no Mac friend, BTW) -- PowerMac is 2x Pentium speed. >: MacWorld -- PowerMac is 2x Pentium speed. >Hmm...2x the speed....with maybe .000000001x the software availabiltiy, >.10x the market share It is sad that these factors are considerations. This is the reason we are stuck with this shitty VHS standard. If Sony hadn't been stupid and greedy, we would all be using Beta VCR's wouldn't we? >(ie if you are working at a business, chances are >you'll have to be familiar with Microsoft/Intel platforms, unless you're >workking in music, academia, and a few other fields dominated by right >brainers who seem to have trouble installing CD-ROMs and using a >command-line interface rather than a native GUI interface), and, when you I work for one of the largest internet service providers in the country and every employee has a mac on their desk. My last job was with a publisher of interpretations of government regulations, also a mac shop. <...>>BTW, congratulations, Apple.... you finally got PCI. The architecture of >PCs seems to always be a few steps ahead of the Macs. Yeah, right. Ever hear of plug and play? How about PostScript, or MacTCP? Considering that we are communicating via the internet, I'd like to say that configuring a mac for a ppp dialup is one whole hell of a lot easier than a PC (assuming you go the shareware route). As a person whose job it is to install, upgrade and troubleshoot hardware and software, my choice for business will always be the mac. It doesn't matter what business you are in, most of your users will be idiots. The simpler it is to learn, the better for me. As has been said before in this thread, there is no need to continue re-inventing the wheel. Teaching 100 people a command line interface probably takes 4-5 times as long as an intuitive GUI. Less time training=more time working. For example, how many people spent hours (weeks? months?) learing Wordperfect 4.x and 5.x commands, which became useless when WordPerfect 6 came out? If anyone is willing to defend WordPerfect (the vi of the pc) vs. a windows or mac wordprocesser I'd like to see them try. (Word 6.0 excluded). Also, as a tech, I like that it takes less than 5 minutes to install more ram or a cd-rom player. Just because something isn't hard doesn't make it any less worthwhile. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- | Now is the only thing that's real | Fuck art, let's Kill | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- | Mindless Cynic metzlert@interrmap.com | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<4060fp$n2n@usenet1.interramp.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!interramp.com!usenetReferences:
<3tmppr$8ck@cville-srv.wam.umd.edu> <philip-1207951230470001@macadamia.cs.wits.ac.za> <3u1id7$19b@taco.cc.ncsu.edu> <DByyIp.KDF@utnetw.utoledo.edu> <3uk8lb$2ua@ixnews7.ix.netcom.com> <3vkii2$o6o@freud.inst.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!interramp.com!usenet From: metzlert@interramp.com (Mindless Cynic) Newsgroups: comp.sys.powerpc,comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.sys.mac.advocacy,comp.os.os2.advocacy,comp.sys.amiga.advocacy,comp.sys.intel,alt.2600 Subject: Re: Debate: PowerMac "trounces" Pentium....??? Date: Sun, 06 Aug 1995 21:29:06 GMT Organization: PSI Public Usenet Link Message-ID: <4060fp$n2n@usenet1.interramp.com> References: <3tmppr$8ck@cville-srv.wam.umd.edu> <philip-1207951230470001@macadamia.cs.wits.ac.za> <3u1id7$19b@taco.cc.ncsu.edu> <DByyIp.KDF@utnetw.utoledo.edu> <3uk8lb$2ua@ixnews7.ix.netcom.com> <3vkii2$o6o@freud.inst.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: ip13.herndon2.va.interramp.com X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.0.82