🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <403bl5$45g@data.interserv.net>,
William Rini <billman@centcon.com> wrote:
>It's because the story is not true.
>This is probably the 8 - 10th time that I have heard the same story 
>with a different company or
>government office.  It's always covered by some small publication that
>only the poster subscribes to and it never makes it into the
>mainstream press.  Of course nobody who actually was supposedly
>involved ever is quoted in the piece (too easy to check out the
>story).  Why didn't the piece quote a Motorola employee by name?  Why
>is the source always anonymous?  Why can't anybody ever verify
>anything the original poster claims?  

I've been out of the country for a month, so I haven't seen the
Financial Post since early July.

I'll have to take a look to verify that the story was in there.

The Financial Post is *not* some "small publication that only the
poster subscribes to;" it's one of the three financial newspapers
that the multinational company that I'm currently consulting at
receives on a daily basis.  More particularly, it's one of the
top two national papers in Canada.  (The Globe and Mail being
the other one.  I prefer the Globe, myself.)

The fact that names at Motorola weren't named could just be that
the spokespeople prefer to get less harassment from outside.
-- 
Christopher Browne - Email:<cbbrown@io.org>, WWW:<http://www.io.org/~cbbrown/>
Q: How do you make Windows go faster???                  A: THROW IT HARDER!!!