Article View: comp.sys.powerpc
Article #863Re: Windows 95 hoopla
From: Joseph T. Malloy
Date: Fri, 11 Aug 1995 18:37
Date: Fri, 11 Aug 1995 18:37
18 lines
1506 bytes
1506 bytes
In article <40ae0m$1lol@sat.ipp-garching.mpg.de> bds@ipp-garching.mpg.de (Bruce Scott TOK ) writes: >All these people telling us, "don't worry, the user is asked permission >to transmit the data to Microsoft and if s/he says no the data are not >transmitted", are forgetting one very important point: These days, not >only are the majority of personal computers running Windows by default >rather than choice, the majority of installations are either factory or >dealer installations. Most of these will say "yes" when Microsoft's >Registration Wizard asks for something, because they will want to be >seen as cooperative. If the average user couldn't care less whether Microsoft "sees" what they're running, who are you to decide they're wrong? Just because *you* have an irrational fear of a pretty well accepted industry practice doesn't mean it's a bad thing to be given the *choice* to register electronically. Come back and complain when you don't have any choice in the matter. [snip]
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<40g80c$l0f@itsmail1.hamilton.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!itsmail1.hamilton.edu!newsShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!itsmail1.hamilton.edu!news From: jmalloy@itsmail1.hamilton.edu (Joseph T. Malloy) Newsgroups: comp.sys.powerpc,comp.terminals.tty5620,comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.sys.mac.advocacy,comp.os.os2.advocacy,comp.sys.amiga.advocacy,comp.sys.intel,alt.2600,alt.destroy.microsoft Subject: Re: Windows 95 hoopla Date: 11 Aug 1995 14:37:00 -0400 Organization: Hamilton College Distribution: inet Message-ID: <40g80c$l0f@itsmail1.hamilton.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: itsmail1.hamilton.edu