Re: Transputer dead?

Article View: comp.sys.transputer

Article #40

Back to comp.sys.transputer Previous Next

#40

From: Graham Toal gtoal
Date: Sat, 04 Apr 1992 22:11

13 lines
1271 bytes

In article <1992Apr1.165109.12132@hubcap.clemson.edu> thompson@inmos.co.uk (Peter Thompson) writes:
:I'm happy to say that time will prove you wrong.  We have plenty of customers
:eagerly awaiting the T9000 whom we do not intend to disappoint.  In any case
:it would hardly be "good business sense" for the corporation to can the
:project now after so much has been invested in it.

Can't comment on the transputer-wars, but I've seen enough companies go
down through throwing good money after bad because some MD had a personal
hobbyhore he wanted ridden than I can confidently disagree with your
'hardly be "good ..."' comment.

Graham (who is thinking of applying the dsame logic to his London flat...)
--

Technical Details

Message-ID: <1992Apr04.221158.9080@robobar.co.uk>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!mips!swrinde!gatech!hubcap!fpst

References: <19352@castle.ed.ac.uk> <1992Apr1.165109.12132@hubcap.clemson.edu>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!mips!swrinde!gatech!hubcap!fpst
From: gtoal@robobar.co.uk (Graham Toal "gtoal@vangogh.cs.berkeley.edu")
Newsgroups: comp.sys.transputer,comp.parallel
Subject: Re: Transputer dead?
Message-ID: <1992Apr04.221158.9080@robobar.co.uk>
Date: 4 Apr 92 22:11:58 GMT
References: <19352@castle.ed.ac.uk> <1992Apr1.165109.12132@hubcap.clemson.edu>
Sender: fpst@hubcap.clemson.edu (Steve Stevenson)
Organization: Robobar Ltd., Perivale, Middx., ENGLAND.
Lines: 13
Approved: parallel@hubcap.clemson.edu

Reply to Parent Message