🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Thread View: comp.sys.transputer
1 messages
1 total messages Started by David Laurenson Thu, 16 Nov 1989 16:38
Transputer Link Analyser Follow-up
#398
Author: David Laurenson
Date: Thu, 16 Nov 1989 16:38
50 lines
2793 bytes
About a week ago I sent a message asking for help, namely...

>I am trying to build a transputer link analyser that passively
>monitors the communications link between two transputers, and produces
>a high level (hopefully) form of debugging/performance monitoring.
>I am currently trying to find a suitable differential driver/receiver
>pair that I can use that will not introduce more than 3nS skew.

I have received a number of replies, some of which were very helpful.
I obviously did not make it clear what I was intending to do.   I am
going to use a C011 link adaptor to read in the link data, it is the
electrical interface that I am worried about.   I have had a number of
suggestions about suitable chips:-

Erik Johansson of Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory replies:-

>Our links are buffered between boards using 74LS240s (or 74LS540s).
>You could equally well use 74LS244s or 74LS541s.  We use a 100 ohm
>series resistor to provide impedance matching on the sending side, and
>the signal is carried by a twisted pair wire with one side tied to
>ground.  On the receiving end, we use a 100k ohm pull-up resistor to
>keep unconnected links idle (it is a pull-up because our logic is
>inverted between boards).  Although this scheme is not differential,
>we have not had any problems with noise, and have driven the links at
>both 10 and 20 MHz.

David Boreham of inMoS replies:-

>Try National Semiconductor parts DS8921A, DS8922A, DS8923A.
>The best parts known are made by AT&T but are not generally
>available. We have in-house link monitors and will be 
>bringing out a commrecial one in the next few months.

And finally from Lyle Bingham of Computer Systems Architects,

>You might investigate use of the National Semiconductor 26F31 and 26F32
>devices.  AMD makes a workable set of differential buffers that we
>have used for years.  These are the 26LS31 and 26LS32.
>If you can handle the speed, the optimum for skew is probably the
>26C31/32 pair from National.  Also of note is the National DS 8921 AN
>differential driver/receiver pair.

Thanks for all your help, and any further suggestions can be mailed to
me at my address below.

Dave.
    David I. Laurenson                |
    Department of Computer Science    |
    Edinburgh University King's Bldgs |  JANET   dil@uk.ac.ed.lfcs
    Mayfield Road, EDINBURGH  U.K.    |
Thread Navigation

This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.

Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.

Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.

Back to All Threads