🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Thread View: comp.sys.transputer
4 messages
4 total messages Started by STORZ Tue, 28 Nov 1989 18:43
Re: H1 transputer: Code compatible?!?
#430
Author: STORZ
Date: Tue, 28 Nov 1989 18:43
27 lines
1312 bytes
In article <8911281522.AA26703@tcgould.TN.CORNELL.EDU>, Klaus Kusche <K312240%AE
   ARN.BITNET@tcgould.TN.CORNELL.EDU> writes:
>
> The only definite (printed and Inmos-authored) information I've ever
> seen about the new H1 transputer appears in the SERC/DTI Mailshot,
> issue November 1989, page 10.

The information I have read (SGS-Thomson-Cheft Pistorio) announced
the H1 as
      - full command compatible to t4/t8 transputers (???)
      - 100 MIPS/20 MFlops
      - at least 18 months from now
      - fighting for the embedded market

Anywhere else I have read  (sounds like ideas, not yet fixed)
        - virtual links (routing in hardware)
        - internal RAM (used like before or switched as fast CACHE)
        - commands for fast 'standard' languages like C
        - (perhaps MMU ???)

Somewhere else I heard about 6 links ?

No garanty for that informations.

Clemens Storz
EMBL Heidelberg
Re: H1 transputer: Code compatible?!?
#431
Author: James Price Salsman
Date: Wed, 29 Nov 1989 12:59
25 lines
1394 bytes
STORZ@EMBL.BITNET writes:
>         - virtual links (routing in hardware)
Yes.  Keeping this backward-compatible is going to require
stressful contortions on the part of many designers...

>         - internal RAM (used like before or switched as fast CACHE)
Only 2K instead of 4K.

>         - commands for fast 'standard' languages like C
Dunno.  I sure hope they come up with somthing faster than
the "lend" instruction for tight inner toops, though.

>         - (perhaps MMU ???)
Yes, designed to run Unix.  Also static column mode DRAM addressing.

> Somewhere else I heard about 6 links ?
Nope, only TWO!!!  Kinda defeats the purpose.  The H-1 is
definetly going to be a linear array.

The funny thing is that it seems very much like the iWarp
being developed here.  I'm soooo confused.

-----
:James Salsman (js7a+@andrew.cmu.edu)
::Carnegie Mellon
Re: H1 transputer
#438
Author: A.B.Smith
Date: Thu, 30 Nov 1989 15:21
60 lines
2820 bytes
In article <IZQx_kG00WB382fmY3@andrew.cmu.edu> js7a+@andrew.cmu.edu (James Price Salsman) writes:
>STORZ@EMBL.BITNET writes:
>Only 2K instead of 4K.
>
>Nope, only TWO!!!  Kinda defeats the purpose.  The H-1 is
>definetly going to be a linear array.
>

The T400 has 2K on-chip RAM, 2 links, etc.

There seems to be some confusion between the H1 and the T400. This is a
copy of the ***INMOS*** 'Product Update' published in the SERC/DTI
Transputer Initiative Mailshot (November 1989). And I beleive this is the
only official information INMOS have released.

Enjoy :-)

Andrew. (typing mistakes are mine).

Next Generation - H1
--------------------

The next generation of transputer is under development now and is
codenamed "H1". Silicon is scheduled for 1Q91 and we have released some
preliminary bullet points to give an indication of the performance and
features we are planning.

- Code compatable with T800. H1 will be able to run all your existing
  software, making system updates very simple. You will also be able to
  build systems with mixed H1 and T2/T4 or T8 processors.

- Performance will be greater than 100 MIPS and 20 MFLOPS on a single
  processor giving over five times the performance of existing t800-20
  products.

- The on-chip memory will be enlarged and operated as on-chip cache to
  support the performance levels indicated above.

- The external memory interface will continue to offer a programmable
  minimum chip solution for DRAM, SRAM and EPROMs. It will include all the
  logic required to support new features such as static column and page
  mode DRAMS.

- The serial links on the transputer will support a higher rate and
  conform to a new protocol to increase communications bandwidth.

  There will also be hardware support for virtual channels and message
  passing, thus making the design of networks of transputers more
  effective and efficient.

  There will be an interface chip so that the new links can be connected
  to existing link technology.

Further information will be released on this exciting new product during
the first half of next year.
-- 

Andrew B Smith
Computing Laboratory, The University, Canterbury, Kent. CT2 7NF, UK
Telephone: (0227) 764000 ext: 7684; JANET:  abs@UK.AC.UKC
Re: H1 transputer: Code compatible?!?
#441
Author: Rick 'Transputer' Stein
Date: Sat, 02 Dec 1989 00:43
38 lines
2204 bytes
In article <8911282053.AA06866@tcgould.TN.CORNELL.EDU> STORZ@EMBL.BITNET writes:
>
>The information I have read (SGS-Thomson-Cheft Pistorio) announced
>the H1 as
>      - full command compatible to t4/t8 transputers (???)
>      - 100 MIPS/20 MFlops
>      - at least 18 months from now
>      - fighting for the embedded market
>
>        - virtual links (routing in hardware)
>        - internal RAM (used like before or switched as fast CACHE)
>        - commands for fast 'standard' languages like C
>        - (perhaps MMU ???)
>
>Clemens Storz
My sources (who will remain entirely anonymous) have stated the
following data:
 - 100 MIPS
 - 4 bi-directional links @ 10 MBytes/s per direction
 - virtual channels (potentially worm-hole thru-routing)
 - 15 MFlops Linpac
 - 30 - 50 MHz clock rate (Guess which clock for above figures)
 - 168 pins (maybe 144) 
 - 16 KByte on-chip fully associative cache
 - two external memory configurations selectable thru on-chip registers
   - SRAM - 20 bit address bus + 32 bit data bus
   - DRAM - 16 bit address bus (RAS/CAS multiplexing done on-chip)
          - 32 bit data bus
          - 4 banks of interleaved DRAM
          - each bank can be page mode or static column mode accessed
          - can directly drive up to 16 MBytes DRAM
 - improved interrupt handling
 - multiple priority levels?
 - instruction set compatible with existing transputers
-- 
Richard M. Stein (aka, Rick 'Transputer' Stein)
Sole proprietor of Rick's Software Toxic Waste Dump and Kitty Litter Co.
"You build 'em, we bury 'em." uucp: ...{spsd, zardoz, felix}!dhw68k!stein 
Thread Navigation

This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.

Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.

Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.

Back to All Threads