🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: comp.test
Article #40

Re: Does anyone from bellsouth.net care?

#40
From: Mark V
Date: Fri, 30 May 2003 19:28
54 lines
3582 bytes
burris wrote in news:3ED7ADE0.4000204@bellsouth.net:

> 
> 
> Mark V wrote:
>>  BOB wrote in news:OAIBa.10358$HM1.9756@fe02.atl2.webusenet.com:
>> 
>> 
>>>Tap Gray wrote:
>>>
>>>>Interesting responses to my vent/"whine".  I don't think I'm a
>>>>"binary junkie", as my 25+ subscribed newsgroups are text-only
>>>>and mostly IT-related, and am merely expressing my
>>>>dissatisfaction at the constant stalls, "too many connections"
>>>>errors, and general recent slowness of browsing newsgroups.
>>>>
>>>>Hal, you may be right about some of the complainers, but in my
>>>>mind that doesn't excuse poor service.
>>>>
>>>>Tap
>>>>
>>>
>>>Same thing here.  I only use *ONE* binary group, and by most
>>>standards here, it would be described as abandoned.  MAYBE 5 to
>>>10 posts a day, and many of the subscribers are still on dial-up
>>>so we try to keep the .jpgs at around 100Kb or less.
>>>The other groups are TEXT ONLY and they have the same problems.
>> 
>> 
>> Maybe there is a solution (just in part) lurking in all of
>> this... I too am TEXT groups only.  If separating the access (by
>> news server IP) into two points (one Text-Only and another
>> Binary-only) would help, then why not?
> 
> Mark....
> 
> I used to think this as well, but some time ago I corresponded
> with the infamous Dwight, and for some reason I think he told me
> that storage space aside, text groups were more difficult than
> binary. I don't understand it but maybe Hal could jump in and
> explain.. 

You believed Dwight? <G>   Actually he did seem credible at the time.  

In any case there is yet another consideration.  Now (some ISPs) and 
likely in the future (like it or not) most/all ISPs will implement a 
download (MBs) cap and charge more for over the limit.  Separating 
heavy-bandwidth (fee) vs. light bandwidth for USENET might make a 
difference for all on where the cap line is drawn in the future.  
Just idle thoughts.  I'm sure nothing significant will come of it.  
And no customer input will be solicited or considered at all in any 
eventuality.  Do I sound bitter?

Hal?
Technical Details
Message-ID: <Xns938B9EABB8704z9zzaQ2btw@65.82.44.187>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!sn-xit-02!sn-xit-06!sn-xit-08!supernews.com!38.144.126.75.MISMATCH!feed1.newsreader.com!newsreader.com!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!c03.atl99!news.webusenet.com!pc01.webusenet.com!fe06.atl2.webusenet.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
References: <3ED5FF98.1170@nobellmoresouthspam.net> <bicddvkqb9rvm7ukvk1hqcm57qib96g7e9@4ax.com> <l4gddvct3lotb5onhjh6hobk9ocunfmi83@4ax.com> <slrnbddh6m.39v.hal@feenix.burgiss.net> <qgDBa.6602$dv3.5961@fe07.atl2.webusenet.com> <3ED737F0.471A@nobellmoresouthspam.net> <OAIBa.10358$HM1.9756@fe02.atl2.webusenet.com> <Xns938B85A711B45z9zzaQ2btw@65.82.44.187> <3ED7ADE0.4000204@bellsouth.net>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: ff7a5,95346b0958cb8026
X-Google-Attributes: gidff7a5,public
X-Google-Thread: 1122a6,8aa8b126ae084466
X-Google-Attributes: gid1122a6,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-05-30 12:35:58 PST
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!sn-xit-02!sn-xit-06!sn-xit-08!supernews.com!38.144.126.75.MISMATCH!feed1.newsreader.com!newsreader.com!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!c03.atl99!news.webusenet.com!pc01.webusenet.com!fe06.atl2.webusenet.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: comp.test,bellsouth.net.support.adsl
Subject: Re: Does anyone from bellsouth.net care?
From: Mark V <invalid@notvalid.net>
References: <3ED5FF98.1170@nobellmoresouthspam.net> <bicddvkqb9rvm7ukvk1hqcm57qib96g7e9@4ax.com> <l4gddvct3lotb5onhjh6hobk9ocunfmi83@4ax.com> <slrnbddh6m.39v.hal@feenix.burgiss.net> <qgDBa.6602$dv3.5961@fe07.atl2.webusenet.com> <3ED737F0.471A@nobellmoresouthspam.net> <OAIBa.10358$HM1.9756@fe02.atl2.webusenet.com> <Xns938B85A711B45z9zzaQ2btw@65.82.44.187> <3ED7ADE0.4000204@bellsouth.net>
Organization: UFP
Message-ID: <Xns938B9EABB8704z9zzaQ2btw@65.82.44.187>
User-Agent: Xnews/5.04.25
Lines: 56
X-Complaints-To: abuse@usenetserver.com
X-Abuse-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly.
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 30 May 2003 15:28:38 EDT
Date: Fri, 30 May 2003 19:28:38 GMT