Article View: comp.text.desktop
Article #658Re: Xerography or Offset?
From: chuq
Date: Thu, 07 May 1987 17:32
Date: Thu, 07 May 1987 17:32
28 lines
1968 bytes
1968 bytes
Date: Wed, 6 May 87 09:28:54 PDT
From: rupp@cod.nosc.mil (William L. Rupp)
Organization: Computer Sciences Corp., San Diego
This is a subject that I know a fair bit about. I was President, and
later monthly newsletter editor, of a large Apple computer user group
here in San Diego. At one point I did a survey of the various options
open to us for reproducing our newsletter. We considered buying a
copier, using Xerography, using offset, etc. At various times we used
both offset and copier services.
You have pretty well listed the options and their good and bad points.
I am not really familiar with your publication, so I don't have a feel
for what you are or where you are going. Nevertheless, I can say
firmly that if you can possibly help it, don`t get involved in the
printing business. Leave that to the professionals. It is well worth
the cost, I believe, to send your work to a printer, no matter what kind
of technology he uses, than to tackle, month after month, the hassle
of running your own press. It may seem like a lot of money, but your
time is really the most valuable thing you have.
----------------------------------------
Submissions to: desktop%plaid@sun.com -OR- sun!plaid!desktop
Administrivia to: desktop-request%plaid@sun.com -OR- sun!plaid@desktop-request
Paths: {ihnp4,decwrl,hplabs,seismo,ucbvax}!sun
Chuq Von Rospach chuq@sun.COM [I don't read flames]
There is no statute of limitations on stupidity
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<18291@sun.uucp>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!rutgers!lll-lcc!ames!oliveb!sun!plaid!chuqShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!rutgers!lll-lcc!ames!oliveb!sun!plaid!chuq From: chuq@plaid.UUCP Newsgroups: comp.text.desktop Subject: Re: Xerography or Offset? Message-ID: <18291@sun.uucp> Date: Thu, 7-May-87 13:32:11 EDT Article-I.D.: sun.18291 Posted: Thu May 7 13:32:11 1987 Date-Received: Sat, 9-May-87 05:40:44 EDT Sender: news@sun.uucp Distribution: comp Lines: 28 Approved: desktop-request%plaid@sun.com