Article View: comp.text.desktop
Article #659Re: Xerography or Offset?
From: chuq
Date: Thu, 07 May 1987 17:44
Date: Thu, 07 May 1987 17:44
20 lines
1444 bytes
1444 bytes
Date: 6 May 87 09:50:07 PDT
From: starkweather.pa@Xerox.COM
You can all of the finishing (stapling saddle stitiching etc.) functions
with Xerographic copies. Offset must be finished off-line. Larger
copiers have many finishing and collating functions that offset has not
even begun to address. If you have large volume, high quality pictorials
then perhaps offset is a necessity. On the other hand if you run very
few copies per month (3000-5000) that is only 100 to 200 copies per day
and the labor is so small, why automate it or pay to have it automated?
Gary Starkweather - Xerox PARC
----------------------------------------
Submissions to: desktop%plaid@sun.com -OR- sun!plaid!desktop
Administrivia to: desktop-request%plaid@sun.com -OR- sun!plaid@desktop-request
Paths: {ihnp4,decwrl,hplabs,seismo,ucbvax}!sun
Chuq Von Rospach chuq@sun.COM [I don't read flames]
There is no statute of limitations on stupidity
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<18299@sun.uucp>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!rutgers!uwvax!oddjob!hao!ames!oliveb!sun!plaid!chuqShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!rutgers!uwvax!oddjob!hao!ames!oliveb!sun!plaid!chuq From: chuq@plaid.UUCP Newsgroups: comp.text.desktop Subject: Re: Xerography or Offset? Message-ID: <18299@sun.uucp> Date: Thu, 7-May-87 13:44:43 EDT Article-I.D.: sun.18299 Posted: Thu May 7 13:44:43 1987 Date-Received: Sat, 9-May-87 05:49:26 EDT Sender: news@sun.uucp Distribution: comp Lines: 20 Approved: desktop-request%plaid@sun.com