🚀 go-pugleaf

nmouawad@water.waterloo.edu (Naji Mouawad) writes:

| In article <1076@duteca.UUCP> kooijman@duteca (Richard Kooijman) writes:
| >peter@ficc.ferranti.com (Peter da Silva) writes:
| >
| >Or Lotus Manuscript.
| >This is a great wordprocessor which has several capabilities, that WP and WfW
| >have included only recently.
| >Why is it so impopular? 
| 
| IMHO, for a simple reason: Tech support and learning curve. WP has an
| edge over all the other editors: 800 free line. No matter what 
| kind of a problem you run into, there is a human person to help
| you. Best feature, ever.

Definitely.  You can't beat toll-free 1-800 support.

| Sprint seems to be a great editor. vi probably is, even though it has
| a rather unique or peculiar set-up, so is Emacs. The biggest problems
| with these editors is their biggest asset: hard learning curve, no
| context-sensitive help, and above all, no menu. Fast and dirty.

[[ "vi probably is ... a great editor"?! 8-P ]]

No menu?  Read the subject line again -- WP 5.1 has menu and mouse
support included.

| Not for every one.

Vi is definitely not for everyone.
--
       Eric Peterson <> epeterson@encore.com <> uunet!encore!epeterson
   Encore Computer Corp. * Ft. Lauderdale, Florida * (305) 587-2900 x 5208
Why did Constantinople get the works? Gung'f abobql'f ohfvarff ohg gur Ghexf.