🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Thread View: comp.unix.admin
3 messages
3 total messages Started by Bob, the mostly all knowing (tm) Sun, 06 May 2001 23:10
Sysadmins overtime eligible?
#4436
Author: Bob, the mostly all knowing (tm)
Date: Sun, 06 May 2001 23:10
24 lines
2330 bytes
I'm employed in the state of California as a UNIX administrator.  I am
salaried, at a rate that, divied by 52 and again by 40, is significantly
less than $41/hour.  My job description includes "analyze user
requirements, proceedures, and probles to automate processing or to
improve existing systems," [sec. 3(1)(A)], "plan, design, and build medium
and large-scale UNIX systems to support developers and provide computing
services required by end users," [sec. 3(1)(B)], etc.

However, subdivision (b) (exceptions to the overtime elibigility)
specifies:  "The employee is engaged in the operation of computers or in
the manufacture, repair, or maintenance of computer hardware and
related equipment."

Ungh.  I wish I was a lawyer.  The link to the full text of the bill:
http://info.sen.ca.gov/pub/99-00/bill/sen/sb_0051-0100/sb_88_bill_20000919_chaptered.html

I can provide my full job description if anyone wants to see it.

Just wondering, because the recent downturn has left my roommate
unemployed, and us locked into a lease that we can't afford to break, and
a few extra bucks where I can find them will help immeasurably.  :/

Thanks in advance,
Bob
Re: Sysadmins overtime eligible?
#4437
Author: Jimi Thompson
Date: Tue, 08 May 2001 04:09
32 lines
2757 bytes
T
Bob, the mostly all knowing (tm) <bob@noses.org> wrote in message
news:Pine.LNX.4.30.0105061558340.13121-100000@hermes.noses.org...
> I'm employed in the state of California as a UNIX administrator.  I am
> salaried, at a rate that, divied by 52 and again by 40, is significantly
> less than $41/hour.  My job description includes "analyze user
> requirements, proceedures, and probles to automate processing or to
> improve existing systems," [sec. 3(1)(A)], "plan, design, and build medium
> and large-scale UNIX systems to support developers and provide computing
> services required by end users," [sec. 3(1)(B)], etc.
>
> However, subdivision (b) (exceptions to the overtime elibigility)
> specifies:  "The employee is engaged in the operation of computers or in
> the manufacture, repair, or maintenance of computer hardware and
> related equipment."
>
> Ungh.  I wish I was a lawyer.  The link to the full text of the bill:
>
http://info.sen.ca.gov/pub/99-00/bill/sen/sb_0051-0100/sb_88_bill_20000919_c
haptered.html
>
> I can provide my full job description if anyone wants to see it.
>
> Just wondering, because the recent downturn has left my roommate
> unemployed, and us locked into a lease that we can't afford to break, and
> a few extra bucks where I can find them will help immeasurably.  :/
>
> Thanks in advance,
> Bob
The normal sysadmin job description would apply to the "maintence" portion
of section b.
>
Re: Sysadmins overtime eligible?
#4438
Author: Arthur L. Rubin
Date: Wed, 09 May 2001 05:02
26 lines
2644 bytes
Bob, the mostly all knowing (tm) wrote:
> 
> I'm employed in the state of California as a UNIX administrator.  I am
> salaried, at a rate that, divied by 52 and again by 40, is significantly
> less than $41/hour.  My job description includes "analyze user
> requirements, proceedures, and probles to automate processing or to
> improve existing systems," [sec. 3(1)(A)], "plan, design, and build medium
> and large-scale UNIX systems to support developers and provide computing
> services required by end users," [sec. 3(1)(B)], etc.
> 
> However, subdivision (b) (exceptions to the overtime elibigility)
> specifies:  "The employee is engaged in the operation of computers or in
> the manufacture, repair, or maintenance of computer hardware and
> related equipment."

Sorry.  My take is that the normal duties of a sysadmin would fall
under the "operation of computers" and "repair, or maintenance of
computer hardware and related equipment."

Then again, there was also an "minimum wage" for that exemption, and,
if it's $41 rather than the $27 I remember, you may be covered by
overtime laws.  (I'm over $41/hour, myself, but I'm contract/hourly,
which adds to the confusion.)

-- 
Arthur L. Rubin   216-5888@mcimail.com
Thread Navigation

This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.

Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.

Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.

Back to All Threads