Re: VSHIELD, VIRSTOP, ... comparison ? (PC)

Thread View: comp.virus

1 messages

[T] Back to Threads [V] Tree View [G] Group Articles

1 total messages Started by David_Conrad Wed, 23 Dec 1992 10:16

#4740

Author: David_Conrad
Date: Wed, 23 Dec 1992 10:16

18 lines
1076 bytes

In VIRUS-L v5i207 Nemrod_Kedem@f101.n9721.z9.virnet.bad.se (Nemrod Kedem) write
s:
> > 3) VShield uses much more memory than VirStop.
>
>But may be loaded to high memory, and then needs less then 1K of
>conventional memory.
 
Implying that Virstop cannot?!  Virstop can be loaded high, and then
requires no conventional memory.
 
And still, VSHIELD will use more high memory that Virstop, reducing the
number of other things you can have loaded high simultaneously.
Even with loadhigh in DOS 5.0, smaller is still better when it
comes to memory-resident programs.
 
Regards,
David R. Conrad
David_Conrad@mts.cc.wayne.edu, dave@michigan.com

Thread Navigation

This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.

Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.

Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.

Back to All Threads