🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <orsq3gg@fido.asd.sgi.com> linton@marktwain.rad.sgi.com (Mark Linton) writes:
>In article <1992Aug20.120731.22846@tom.rz.uni-passau.de>, ringel@forwiss.uni-passau.de (Joerg Ringel) writes:
>|> 
>|> Why do you write
>|> 
>|>     virtual Glyph* vslider(Adjustable*) const;
>|>     ....   ?
>|> 
>|> I think it is more useful if you write:
>|> 
>|>     virtual Slider* vslider(Adjustable*) const;
>|> 
>|> 
>|> Is there a reason for it ?
>
>WidgetKit::vslider doesn't typically return a slider directly; there is normally
>a frame or other decoration around it.  Why do you want to do to the slider
>that requires access to it?

I also wanted something like the above.  In my case I want to dynamically
change the adjustable that the slider is associated with.  So I would
like:

  virtual YSlider* vslider(Adjustable*) const;
  virtual void YSlider::associate(Adjustable*);
-- 
Denis Bohm (denis@redwood.com -or- denisb@leland.stanford.edu)