Two questions about the RPC classes

Thread View: comp.windows.interviews

1 messages

[T] Back to Threads [V] Tree View [G] Group Articles

1 total messages Started by Johan Garpendahl Mon, 11 Jan 1993 23:38

#1654

Author: Johan Garpendahl
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 1993 23:38

22 lines
1173 bytes

1) Shouldn't they really be called IPC classes?

As far as I can see, they implement Inter Process Communication, 
rather than Remote Procedure Calls. This is a minor detail though.

2) Isn't overloading on return type illegal?

I compiled the RPC classes with g++-2.3.3, and I have had great
difficulties with getting the sendplot/plot program to work, mainly
because g++ calls the iostream versions of operator<< and operator>>
rather than the iostreamb versions.

Is this an example of overloading on the return type, which I think is
illegal in c++, or is this a bug in g++? 

	Johan

-- 
Johan Garpendahl                   | Email: garp@isy.liu.se
Linkoping University               | Phone: +46 - 13 - 28 13 24
Dept. of Electrical Engineering    | Fax  : +46 - 13 - 13 92 82
S-581 83  LINKOPING // SWEDEN      | May the Source be with you.

Thread Navigation

This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.

Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.

Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.

Back to All Threads