Thread View: comp.windows.misc
2 messages
2 total messages
Started by Peter Pui Tak Chiu
Mon, 10 Aug 1992 17:30
Stacker 2.0 and Windows 3.1
Author: Peter Pui Tak Chiu
Date: Mon, 10 Aug 1992 17:30
Date: Mon, 10 Aug 1992 17:30
22 lines
895 bytes
895 bytes
Hi everyone, does anyone know if Stacker 2.0 is compatible with Smartdrv 4.0 of Windows 3.1? that is, if i install Stacker, can i still cache the stacked drive? when i read the readme.wri in windows directory, it says superstor is not compatible with smartdrv. that means you can't cache the drive that is superstored is that true for stacker 2.0 also? please give me some advice thanks .... oh.. i am using a 486-33, 256K cache, 8M ram... if that helps pete
Re: Stacker 2.0 and Windows 3.1
Author: RALPH KOTOSKI
Date: Thu, 20 Aug 1992 21:48
Date: Thu, 20 Aug 1992 21:48
27 lines
1409 bytes
1409 bytes
>does anyone know if Stacker 2.0 is compatible with Smartdrv 4.0 of Windows 3.1? I'm using all three without a single problem... >that is, if i install Stacker, can i still cache the stacked drive? The Stacker Manual recommends caching the harddrive that contains STACVOL. This way, the stacked drive is cached and you can bring more into cache since it is compressed. >when i read the readme.wri in windows directory, it says superstor is not compatible with smartdrv. >that means you can't cache the drive that is superstored >is that true for stacker 2.0 also? Don't know what superstor is. But shouldn't need to cache STACVOL, just the drive it resides on. Hope this helps.... Ralph Kotoski Hewlett-Packard PSO Performance Specialist Neely Sales Region ralphk@hpuecoz.nsr.hp.com 24 Inverness Place East Ralph_Kotoski@hpatc3.desk.hp.com Englewood, Colorado 80112 (303)-T649-5761 :^)
Thread Navigation
This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.
Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.
Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.
Back to All Threads