Article View: comp.windows.ms
Article #11744Re: WYSIWYG Word Processor for Windows 3.0?
From: Shane Pascoe
Date: Fri, 10 May 1991 01:16
Date: Fri, 10 May 1991 01:16
17 lines
1173 bytes
1173 bytes
I keep hearing how good Ami Professional is and how fast it is, I found as one
of the beta test sites of this product that its macro language had a few short
falls such as the need to have a dialog editor as found in the SDK or
Whitewaters ToolKit to create dialogs, as of beta testing and first release
these where both the Windows 2.0 editors.
Therefore, due to Word for Windows superior basic and Microsofts forcoming
embedded basic and the similarities and ease of exchange of documents with
Word for the Mac, not to mention Microsofts unlimited Technical Support, I
highly reco mend Word for Windows.
Shane Pascoe
Corporate WorkGroup Resources
Sydney, Australia
UUCP: {munnari}!jabaru!anthos!tanus!09381
INET: 09381@tanus.oz.au
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<296@jabaru.oz.au>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!wuarchive!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!samsung!munnari.oz.au!jabaru!tanus!09381Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!wuarchive!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!samsung!munnari.oz.au!jabaru!tanus!09381 From: 09381@tanus.oz.au (Shane Pascoe) Newsgroups: comp.windows.ms Subject: Re: WYSIWYG Word Processor for Windows 3.0? Message-ID: <296@jabaru.oz.au> Date: 10 May 91 01:16:23 GMT Sender: news@jabaru.oz.au Organization: People-Net [tanus], Melbourne, Australia Lines: 17