Article View: comp.windows.ms
Article #2462Re: Which Word Processor is easiest to use?
From: David Gardiner
Date: Tue, 29 May 1990 12:55
Date: Tue, 29 May 1990 12:55
15 lines
1037 bytes
1037 bytes
In article <7343@fy.sei.cmu.edu> bwb@sei.cmu.edu (Bruce Benson) writes: >Mac Word, while graphically oriented, has the power of Word for DOS and IMHO >is well behind WfW. I suspect an upgrade for Mac Word to incorporate the I heard from someone in Microsoft that WfW has been their focus for a couple of years and that all of the neat new stuff in Mac Word 4.0 was originally developed for WfW. David -- -------------------------------------------------------------------- David Gardiner University of Minnesota Computer Science Dept. gardiner@umn-cs.cs.umn.edu
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1990May29.125550.6048@cs.umn.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!rutgers!umn-d-ub!cs.umn.edu!gardinerReferences:
<45720@iuvax.cs.indiana.edu> <30244@cup.portal.com> <7343@fy.sei.cmu.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!rutgers!umn-d-ub!cs.umn.edu!gardiner From: gardiner@cs.umn.edu (David Gardiner) Newsgroups: comp.windows.ms Subject: Re: Which Word Processor is easiest to use? Message-ID: <1990May29.125550.6048@cs.umn.edu> Date: 29 May 90 12:55:50 GMT References: <45720@iuvax.cs.indiana.edu> <30244@cup.portal.com> <7343@fy.sei.cmu.edu> Organization: University of Minnesota, Minneapolis - CSCI Dept. Lines: 15