Re: Which Word Processor is easiest to use?

Article View: comp.windows.ms

Article #2463

#2463

From: David Gardiner
Date: Tue, 29 May 1990 13:05

15 lines
1149 bytes

One nice thing about Ami Pro is that it is more visually oriented than
WfW.  Everything is WYSIWYG (ok, ok, WYSIWYGMoreOrLess).  This means
you don't have to keep going to preview mode since everything is
done in preview mode.  Adding a running header, for example, involves
simply typing in the top or bottom margin.

I have to agree with a previous posting, though, that both Ami Prof
or WfW are complex programs and using them effectively takes a LONG
time to learn.

David
-- 
--------------------------------------------------------------------
David Gardiner        University of Minnesota Computer Science Dept.
gardiner@umn-cs.cs.umn.edu

Technical Details

Message-ID: <1990May29.130536.6739@cs.umn.edu>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!aplcen!samsung!cs.utexas.edu!rutgers!umn-d-ub!cs.umn.edu!gardiner

References: <3378@altos86.Altos.COM> <1990May27.080939.18019@sun.soe.clarkson.edu> <21617@boulder.Colorado.EDU>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!aplcen!samsung!cs.utexas.edu!rutgers!umn-d-ub!cs.umn.edu!gardiner
From: gardiner@cs.umn.edu (David Gardiner)
Newsgroups: comp.windows.ms
Subject: Re: Which Word Processor is easiest to use?
Message-ID: <1990May29.130536.6739@cs.umn.edu>
Date: 29 May 90 13:05:36 GMT
References: <3378@altos86.Altos.COM> <1990May27.080939.18019@sun.soe.clarkson.edu> <21617@boulder.Colorado.EDU>
Organization: University of Minnesota, Minneapolis - CSCI Dept.
Lines: 15

Reply to Parent Message