Re: Egghead: Win 3.1

Article View: comp.windows.ms

Article #293

#293

From: Alireza Vali
Date: Thu, 26 Mar 1992 15:07

14 lines
883 bytes

In article <56182@cup.portal.com> Renee@cup.portal.com (Renee Linda Roberts) writes:

[...]

>I got Windows 3.1 yesterday, and am currently reviewing it for them (not a
>beta, the REAL THING). So far, not bad. I am compiling a list of bugs, and
>will release them here as well as to MS.
>
>Renee

Bugs?  Bugs?  Already?  What's the story?  I thought Windows 3.1 was beta
tested quite extensively.  I would dearly like to know of any potential
bugs.  In such a case, it's probably better to hang on and wait for
3.1a.

Technical Details

Message-ID: <69147@ut-emx.uucp>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!ut-emx!Voyager.me.utexas.edu!reza

References: <1992Mar19.001731.22433@CS.ORST.EDU> <56182@cup.portal.com>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!ut-emx!Voyager.me.utexas.edu!reza
From: reza@Voyager.me.utexas.edu (Alireza Vali)
Newsgroups: comp.windows.ms
Subject: Re: Egghead: Win 3.1
Message-ID: <69147@ut-emx.uucp>
Date: 26 Mar 92 15:07:54 GMT
References: <1992Mar19.001731.22433@CS.ORST.EDU> <56182@cup.portal.com>
Sender: news@ut-emx.uucp
Lines: 15

Reply to Parent Message