Article View: comp.windows.x.apps
Article #729Local clients (Xkernel, Xterminals)
From: Jon Peatfield
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 1993 16:51
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 1993 16:51
41 lines
2581 bytes
2581 bytes
I've just been talking to Tektronix about their new server code for their Xterminals which now supports local clients like MWM or OLWM so that the network local is reduced on networks of Xtermianls. The salesman suggested that all Tek Xterminals really run a cutdown Unix like system really with the Xserver as one client which is how it all works. Now in our department we run a large number of Sun3s (50s and 60s), as Xterminals using Xkernel. I pointed this out to the Tek salesman and he seemed quite surprised. He also told me that Tek would not tell me the way that local clients worked at the moment (he didn't know I think), but that the MWM and OLWM were the real window managers. It occurs to me that I can do the same job on Xkernel by rigging OLWM or TWM or whatever to be started on the Xterminal after it has started up, and get it to communicate with a stub window manager on the host you would normally run the window manager on whenever it needs to read the config file or start up a process (low network stuff.) The best way to achieve this would probably be a server extention (thanks Tim), so that the stub program can instruct the server on the Xterminal to start a local client and set up communications with it. I don't mind this beign completely incompatible with the system that Tek use since they don't want to tell me theirs, (and writing more local clients for their terminals could be hard.) Before I go away and look hard at the Xtensions stuff has anyone else tried this? Does anyone know good ways to go about it? Will it be in X11R6 anyway? (or is it X12R1 next?) Any information would be welcome. Please mail me in preference and I'll summarise (to reduce bandwidth wasted.) -- Jon Peatfield (Unix Network Admin) -- Jon Peatfield, Computer Officer, the DAMTP, University of Cambridge Telephone: (+44 223) 3-37852 Mail: J.S.Peatfield@amtp.cam.ac.uk To be consistent with DNS domain ordering, shouldn't news groups have names like "admin.sun.sys.comp" not "comp.sys.sun.admin" ? EMWTK
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<JP107.93Jan27165115@grus.cus.cam.ac.uk>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!charon.amdahl.com!pacbell.com!sgiblab!spool.mu.edu!agate!doc.ic.ac.uk!warwick!pavo.csi.cam.ac.uk!camcus!jp107Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: comp.windows.x.apps Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!charon.amdahl.com!pacbell.com!sgiblab!spool.mu.edu!agate!doc.ic.ac.uk!warwick!pavo.csi.cam.ac.uk!camcus!jp107 From: jp107@cus.cam.ac.uk (Jon Peatfield) Subject: Local clients (Xkernel, Xterminals) Message-ID: <JP107.93Jan27165115@grus.cus.cam.ac.uk> Sender: news@infodev.cam.ac.uk (USENET news) Nntp-Posting-Host: grus.cus.cam.ac.uk Organization: U of Cambridge, England Distribution: comp Date: Wed, 27 Jan 1993 16:51:24 GMT Lines: 41