🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <491@procase.UUCP> bobw@procase.com (that's me) wrote:

>XVT Software
>
>Product: XVT Portability Toolkit
>	 XVT-Design 
>
>Info:	Runs over native toolkits [Open Systems Today article]
>	Has own interface description language
>	Source licensing is available for a price
>	Source for text widget is available without licensing
>	Bechtel Software dumped it in favor of Neuron Data Open Interface
>	Verity dumped it in favor of Solbourne OI
                         ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

I stand corrected; while Verity no longer uses XVT, it does not use OI either.

I apologize for the error, which stemmed from a poorly-recalled private
conversation.  Thanks to Mike Edmunds for the correction.

--------------------Begin forwarded mail from medmunds@verity.com--------------------

    From uunet!verity.com!medmunds Mon Feb 15 11:24:39 1993
    From: uunet!verity.com!medmunds
    To: bobw@PROCASE.COM
    Subject: Re: SUMMARY Re: Opinions wanted on portable GUI tool kits 
    In-Reply-To: Your message of "11 Feb 93 19:39:00 GMT" <491@procase.UUCP>
    Date: Fri, 12 Feb 93 16:43:06 -0800
     
    You wrote:
     
	Product: XVT Portability Toolkit
	Info:   [...]
		Verity dumped it in favor of Solbourne OI
		
    While it is true that we're no longer using XVT, it is not true that
    we've switched to OI.  Our X product is and always has been written
    directly on top of Motif.  XVT had been used for our Windows and PM
    products, but future releases will use those platforms' native
    toolkits directly.
     
    [Feel free to forward this back into news if you want.]
     
    - Mike Edmunds
      Interface Engineer
      Verity, Inc.
      (medmunds@verity.com)
     
--------------------End forwarded mail from medmunds@verity.com--------------------

-- 
-- Bob Weissman, Senior GUI Designer, Procase Corp.
-- Internet:	bobw@procase.com
-- UUCP:	...!{uunet, voder, veritas}!procase!bobw
--