X server performance tuning as related beach_ball

Article View: comp.windows.x

Article #38172

#38172

From: Peter C. Tam
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 1992 16:46

8 lines
1166 bytes

Hi,
  In the X11R5 manual about beach_ball, it states that it may be hard to
visualize the bouncing motion of the ball when the server implementation
has not been optimized.
  Is there a writeup on how to optimize the server implementation? For now,
I am getting a jittery/flakering image, bouncing when it has not touch the
edge/boundary. I am already using Share-Memory IPC in Sun OS 4.1.1 kernel,
under the SparcStation.

Technical Details

Message-ID: <pct.18@leo.Stanford.EDU>

Path:

arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!peregrine!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!swrinde!mips!cs.uoregon.edu!ogicse!hsdndev!morrow.stanford.edu!leland.Stanford.EDU!aquarius.Stanford.EDU!pct

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103734,3d7fa93cd0190b6c,start
X-Google-Attributes: gid103734,public
X-Google-Thread: 10e286,3d7fa93cd0190b6c,start
X-Google-Attributes: gid10e286,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1992-02-26 07:06:21 PST
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!peregrine!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!swrinde!mips!cs.uoregon.edu!ogicse!hsdndev!morrow.stanford.edu!leland.Stanford.EDU!aquarius.Stanford.EDU!pct
From: pct@leo.Stanford.EDU (Peter C. Tam)
Newsgroups: comp.windows.x,ba.windows.x
Subject: X server performance tuning as related beach_ball
Message-ID: <pct.18@leo.Stanford.EDU>
Date: 25 Feb 92 16:46:19 GMT
Sender: news@leland.Stanford.EDU (Mr News)
Organization: Research Libraries Group, Inc.
Lines: 8