🚀 go-pugleaf

Mike <mike@www.intrig.com> wrote:
: mdwyer@holly.ColoState.EDU (Michael Dwyer):
:> Mike <mike@www.intrig.com> wrote:
:> : route reads :
:> : 127.0.0.0       *             255.0.0.0       U     0      0        0 lo
:> : 127.0.0.1       *             255.255.255.255 UH    0      0        0 lo
:> : 10.0.0.100      *             255.255.255.255 UH    0      0        0 eth0
:> : 10.0.0.0        *             255.255.255.0   U     0      0        0 eth0

Lemme see if I can work this out:
1) Any address that starts with 127 will go direct to loopback
2) Any address that starts with 127.0.0.1 will go direct to loopback.
   This seems redundant, but correct.
3) Any address that starts with 10.0.0.100 will go direct to eth0
4) Any address that starts with 10 will go direct to eth0
   Again, redundant, but I don't see it being wrong...

I dunno.  It looks like it should work.  It seems subtly /wrong/ but it
should work.  <shrug>  Anyway, it works now, yes?

-- 
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Michael J. Dwyer                      I doubt, therefore I might be.
mdwyer@holly.ColoState.edu       http://WWW.CS.ColoState.EDU/~dwyer/
Computer Science Major                      Amateur Radio Tech N0ZAP