Article View: cu.motss
Article #144Re: COLORADO BOYCOTT ACTION IDEAS
From: John Glick
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 1996 00:00
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 1996 00:00
65 lines
3614 bytes
3614 bytes
In article <4ljr6p$qc4@linden.fortnet.org> Veronica Kattnig <tmvsk@linden.fortnet.org> writes: >fedrick@anchor.cs.colorado.edu (Kelvin Fedrick) wrote: >> >> In article <4lh5sm$pq3@lace.colorado.edu>, John Glick <jdg@cdc.noaa.gov> wrote: >> >In article <4l95fa$iq1@linden.fortnet.org> Veronica Kattnig <tmvsk@linden.fortnet.org> writes: >> >>Mike Mills <mills@spot.Colorado.EDU> wrote: >> >>> > All a heterosexual couple has to do is sign a slip of paper >> >>> and they are married. It doesn't even require an agent of the state to >> >>> be present. >> >> >> >>AND have that slip of paper signed by two witnesses. AND have a >> >>person, authorized by the STATE, perform the ceremony. AND have >> >>that person sign that paper. AND, for some of us, supply blood >> >>test results. >> >> >> >>Veronica Kattnig >> > >> >Huh? Last time I checked (and that wasn't long ago, I'm getting married next >> >month) you did not need a blood test to get married in CO and anyone could >> >perform the ceremony. >> >> Veronica is badly mistaken, > >(snip) >> -kelvin > > >Really??? > > >I hold in my hand my Marrage License. > >The only thing that the Marriage Licence does is confirm that >both parties are of legal age and live in that county. But it also >states "to any person or religious society _Authorized >by Law_ to Perform the Marriage Ceremony", and then gives >authorization. It also must be used in 30 days. > >BTW, my blood test results are still attached, but now I find out >by all of you, so well informed about marriage, that I didn't need it. >Still, it states quite clearly on the results that it is required of >females in Colorado. > >On the Certificate, NOT the License, two separate things, a space >for the county, date, place, designation of the official, and some >things about the laws of Colorado, a space for our names, towns, >and our signatures AND space for TWO witnesses AND the person who >performed the ceremony to sign AND affix the seal of the official. > >At the bottom of the marriage certificate, NOT the marriage license, >it says, "This certificate, duly executed together with >the License, must be returned by the minister or officer who shall >have solemnized the marriage, to the office of the County Clerk who >issued the same, promptly." > >More than just two people signing a piece of paper and mailing it >back is required. > >Veronica Kattnig Just out of curiosity, what year is that license from? Laws do change you know. John
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<4ljrlm$gra@lace.colorado.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<4lh5sm$pq3@lace.colorado.edu> <4lhcge$ltc@csnews.cs.colorado.edu> <4ljr6p$qc4@linden.fortnet.org>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 10be61,aa6eaa084db3e9fe X-Google-Attributes: gid10be61,public X-Google-Thread: 108be9,aa6eaa084db3e9fe X-Google-Attributes: gid108be9,public X-Google-Thread: f49ec,aa6eaa084db3e9fe X-Google-Attributes: gidf49ec,public X-Google-Thread: 10bb69,aa6eaa084db3e9fe X-Google-Attributes: gid10bb69,public X-Google-Thread: 12ce57,aa6eaa084db3e9fe X-Google-Attributes: gid12ce57,public X-Google-Thread: f744b,aa6eaa084db3e9fe X-Google-Attributes: gidf744b,public X-Google-Thread: 1026d8,aa6eaa084db3e9fe X-Google-Attributes: gid1026d8,public From: jdg@cdc.noaa.gov (John Glick) Subject: Re: COLORADO BOYCOTT ACTION IDEAS Date: 1996/04/24 Message-ID: <4ljrlm$gra@lace.colorado.edu> X-Deja-AN: 151066458 references: <4lh5sm$pq3@lace.colorado.edu> <4lhcge$ltc@csnews.cs.colorado.edu> <4ljr6p$qc4@linden.fortnet.org> organization: Climate Diagnostics Center newsgroups: cu.motss,soc.motss,co.politics,boulder.general,alt.politics.homosexuality,alt.homosexual,co.politics.amend2.discuss