Article View: cu.slug
Article #44Re: LMI/TI story
From: Peter Paine
Date: Thu, 09 Dec 1999 00:00
Date: Thu, 09 Dec 1999 00:00
36 lines
2798 bytes
2798 bytes
Just to add to your Lisp Machine history, there was a company which licensed MIT ZetaLisp from which they built a Lisp Machine called the KPS (Knowledge Processing System) which ran on Norsk Data super minis. It had many advantages, such as multiport memory, it used stock hardware, supported some 2000 x 1600 pixel screens, allowed integration with conventional programming and processing environments (like using graphics optimized hardware and Fortran to do serious number crunching), large disk clusters, server architecture, ... The company who did all the development work on the KPS was Racal-Norsk, a joint venture between Racal (a UK defense communications and sensors specialists (and founder Vodafone)) and Norsk Data (Norwegian computer company). Various other individuals contributed to the development including Richard Stallman, Dick Gabriel, and Jack Katsburg. The good news about the KPS starts with the fact that the development team did a formal analysis and specification of MIT ZetaLisp (the root of Symbolics, LMI and TI lisp machine architectures) which had never been done before. The good news continued with their success at building a working system. The bad news is that the parent companies fell out of bed just as the development was brought to fruition (after some dozens of man-years work). At which point the 20 odd core developers were all summarily fired and the company assets moth-balled. In terms of LM history, I believe that the KPS was significant, if only for proving that the Lisp Machine architecture can operate successfully under non specialist hardware. When Intel produce a 64 bit processor, I think the ZetaLisp specification produced at Racal-Norsk could be a valuable reference for a developer wishing to produce a Lisp Machine for the next generation. Needless to say, my memory of these events is fading, so I do not guarantee my factual precision, but I think the gist is correct. -Peter Paine
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<944727743.1998@news.Colorado.EDU>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<Pine.BSF.4.05.9912080605590.19741-100000@bogomatic.fredbox.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 10077e,35f205bf40a40236 X-Google-Attributes: gid10077e,public From: Peter Paine <pp@abstractscience.freeserve.co.uk> Subject: Re: LMI/TI story Date: 1999/12/09 Message-ID: <944727743.1998@news.Colorado.EDU> X-Deja-AN: 558478399 Distribution: cu Sender: daemon@peabody.colorado.edu References: <Pine.BSF.4.05.9912080605590.19741-100000@bogomatic.fredbox.com> X-Sender: abstractscience.freeserve.co.uk@pop.freeserve.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" X-Note1: message-id generated by recnews X-Note2: mail msgid was <v04210103b473bffb8769@[62.137.44.133]> Organization: University of Colorado at Boulder Mime-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: cu.slug NNTP-Posting-User: daemon