🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: dc.driving
Article #13069

Re: Daily gripe: Speeds could be higher, per USA today

#13069
From: Dan Nagle
Date: Thu, 11 Feb 1999 00:00
45 lines
2602 bytes
Hello,

Hear, hear!

Note that Va.'s wonderful Gov can't decide to send money to 
Northern Va to fix the roads, but can order a full-press
on speeders on I-81.  Shee-yit.

Walt Horning wrote:
> 
> USA today published a finding recently, that I have quoted before,
> namely that the number of cars on superhighways and only secondary
> roads is nearly equal (2% difference), yet the death rate on the
> secondary roads is three times higher, despite lower speed limits.
> 
> USA Today forgot to say that even though the number of vehicles is
> nearly equal, three times as many superhighway miles are driven than
> on secondary roads. This means that the death rate on superhighways is
> actually about 9 times less for an equal number of miles driven.
> 
> And my gripe is that we have had to listen to butt-head politicians
> preach to us long enough about why they keep fighting higher speed
> limits on superhighways and interstates, and we have had to put up
> with their "tax traps" long enough too. (Even in Maryland when the
> limits went up, the death-rates went down, and its former governor
> even wrote editorials stating how he was just saving lives by opposing
> higher limits. Boy was he dead wrong. Pun intended.)
> 
> If people and politicians want to preach about saving lives, let's
> lower the limits on all secondary roads to about 25 mph, because
> that's what it would take to equalize the death rate to that of the
> superhighways. If they are not willing to do this, then its shear
> hypocrisy to preach against higher speed limits superhighways. Raise
> the limits more!
> 
> In summary, they are full of crap.
> 
> (I even know people who using this false assumption, avoid
> superhighways believing they are so dangerous, and use secondary roads
> believing they are so safe, but they are dead wrong too.)

-- 

Cheers!
Dan Nagle		dnagle@erols.com
Technical Details
Message-ID: <36C2D167.89C5F826@erols.com>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail
References: <36c229db.676265@news.pipeline.com>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 1011e5,fe85b36bf1f48263
X-Google-Attributes: gid1011e5,public
From: Dan Nagle <dnagle@erols.com>
Subject: Re: Daily gripe: Speeds could be higher, per USA today
Date: 1999/02/11
Message-ID: <36C2D167.89C5F826@erols.com>
X-Deja-AN: 443193565
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
References: <36c229db.676265@news.pipeline.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Complaints-To: abuse@rcn.com
X-Trace: 5G6REQ+E4K1sRR8bdvD1nvpQF0Jg0qn3Bkc3NF5K8zI=
Organization: Purple Sage Computing Solution
Mime-Version: 1.0
Reply-To: dnagle@erols.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: 11 Feb 1999 12:48:55 GMT
Newsgroups: dc.driving