Article View: dc.driving
Article #21401Re: Someone adopts warning sign idea! Details?
From: Chris Miller
Date: Mon, 20 Jun 1994 23:15
Date: Mon, 20 Jun 1994 23:15
20 lines
1447 bytes
1447 bytes
In article Jpy@megatest.com, gmandel@megatest.com (Glenn Mandelkern) writes: > >... >According to what I heard, a man had a sign which warned motorists >a few blocks ahead of time that a sobriety checkpoint was taking place. >The man was arrested because he was "impeding with the work of an officer." >He has decided to contest this, stating that it is his First Amendment >right to deliver such notices. > >If any of you have more details on this, how about posting on this, >thoughts in the community, the fate of this man, etc.? > >-- One can only hope that he, rather than someone else, be the next one to lose a family member to a drunk driver. I've waited thru my share of checkpoints, and I believe its a small and tolerable inconvenience, especially considering the damage that can be inflicted by a drunk driver.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1994Jun20.231520.24558@almserv.uucp>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!bga.com!news.sprintlink.net!uunet!almserv!moab!g9ucwmReferences:
<CrpHrz.Jpy@megatest.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 1011e5,804304021f201e7f X-Google-Attributes: gid1011e5,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1994-06-20 19:03:32 PST Newsgroups: dc.driving Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!bga.com!news.sprintlink.net!uunet!almserv!moab!g9ucwm From: g9ucwm@fnma.COM (Chris Miller) Subject: Re: Someone adopts warning sign idea! Details? Message-ID: <1994Jun20.231520.24558@almserv.uucp> Sender: usenet@almserv.uucp Nntp-Posting-Host: moab Reply-To: g9ucwm@fnma.COM Organization: Fannie Mae References: <CrpHrz.Jpy@megatest.com> Date: Mon, 20 Jun 1994 23:15:20 GMT Lines: 21