Re: CALL FOR DISCUSSION: DC.GENERAL.MODERATED

Article View: dc.general

Article #6540

#6540

From: Jules
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 1998 00:00

16 lines
1206 bytes

Either one is fine... I am not sure what the implications of making
dc.general moderated at this point but I would prefer that over a new
newsgroup.

Julie

P.S.  Thank you!!!

Keith A. Glass wrote in message <35E45A32.4492@huskynet.com>...
>Friends, we're fighting a losing war with trollers, cross-posters,
>and their followups on DC.GENERAL.  It seems to get worse and worse.
>
>I think it's time to discuss the possible formation of a MODERATED
>dc.general group, dc.general.moderated.
>
>Any discussion or reply is welcome.

Technical Details

Message-ID: <6s1mjh$1at$1@winter.news.erols.com>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail

References: <35E45A32.4492@huskynet.com>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: f47cb,ccac221f9ee7d622
X-Google-Attributes: gidf47cb,public
X-Google-Thread: 101049,ccac221f9ee7d622
X-Google-Attributes: gid101049,public
From: "Jules" <julie@nospam.com>
Subject: Re: CALL FOR DISCUSSION: DC.GENERAL.MODERATED
Date: 1998/08/26
Message-ID: <6s1mjh$1at$1@winter.news.erols.com>
X-Deja-AN: 385018330
References: <35E45A32.4492@huskynet.com>
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3110.3
X-Complaints-To: abuse@rcn.com
X-Trace: winter.news.erols.com 904158641 1373 207.172.38.86 (26 Aug 1998 19:10:41 GMT)
Organization: RCN Internet
Newsgroups: dc.general,dc.config

Reply to Parent Message