🚀 go-pugleaf

Jules wrote:
> 
> Either one is fine... I am not sure what the implications of making
> dc.general moderated at this point but I would prefer that over a new
> newsgroup.

Retromoderation is in-general a bad idea. Creation of dc.general.moderated
would be a better idea.

> 
> Julie
> 
> P.S.  Thank you!!!
> 
> Keith A. Glass wrote in message <35E45A32.4492@huskynet.com>...
> >Friends, we're fighting a losing war with trollers, cross-posters,
> >and their followups on DC.GENERAL.  It seems to get worse and worse.
> >
> >I think it's time to discuss the possible formation of a MODERATED
> >dc.general group, dc.general.moderated.
> >
> >Any discussion or reply is welcome.

-- 
    Be kind to your neighbors, even though they be transgenic chimerae.
          Re-transmission of this e-mail expressly prohibited. 
  Non-UseNet re-transmission of this article is a willful violation of US
 Copyright Law and the Berne Convention. Statutory damages are $250,000.00
Whom thou'st vex'd waxeth wroth: Meow.      http://www.clark.net/pub/klaatu/