Article View: dc.general
Article #6637Re: Alexandria, VA, newsgroup [Proposal]
From: David H. Rothman
Date: Fri, 15 Sep 1995 00:00
Date: Fri, 15 Sep 1995 00:00
57 lines
3061 bytes
3061 bytes
"How about some proposals on *deleting* groups from this roach motel?" a critic asks in attacking the proposal for va.alexandria. Actually the Net should be more local, not less. I can't help it that some Net providers offer every newsgroup. That's their decision. No one has ever talked about formally giving the proposed newsgroup more than local distribution. This would be a local group, not an alt. one. If skeptics can't manage the present number of groups, then they might want to change providers or news readers. But back to my main point: "Local" is key. The last thing users need is to have to hop from network to network, or from BBS to BBS, to keep up with events in their own towns. Unite folks in the same geographical area and these forums will count more. As it happens, Alexandria is a city of more 100,000. If we can have tiny groups for local hobbyists or for local computer groups, surely an entire city can be served on the Net. Here's to net.power! I, for one, would be highly supportive of newsgroups for other cities. Let's have the Usenet model prevail over the proprietary one. If nothing else, folks will recall that the Net is under attack for distracting people from Life and from their physical surroundings. Here's a constructive response to, say, Silicon Snake Oil. Or to anti-Net forces of the Exonian variety. We need many-to-many communications at the local level, not just the national one. Right now the Net has joke groups, groups for Kibbology, you name it. How about some groups addressing the concerns of real people in real cities? Again, we're talking local, not alt. David Rothman | rothman@clark.net P.S. Speaking of clutter, I'm trimming the reference to us.config, a newsgroup that someone else added to the headers. I understand that it isn't necessary. People should delete us.config from their own headers. This is a *local* proposal. P.P.S. Some people would protest that the Web--which someone offered as part of a different solution--is too cluttered. Can't win :-;.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<43cmpk$pva@clarknet.clark.net>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<42kmet$b1n@clarknet.clark.net> <42t4dv$9as@clarknet.clark.net> <42v4qm$223@blaze.cs.jhu.edu> <cnordin.810754575@sowebo> <42vld1$i3h@clarknet.clark.net> <434toq$ft2@clarknet.clark.net> <43a2g2$7gs@chinstrap.penguin.net> <43cdcb$594@clarknet.clark.net>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: f47cb,c800ab2ad23d91d X-Google-Attributes: gidf47cb,public X-Google-Thread: 101049,c3846332b595f257 X-Google-Attributes: gid101049,public X-Google-Thread: fb785,66708f36390eff91 X-Google-Attributes: gidfb785,public From: "David H. Rothman" <rothman@clark.net> Subject: Re: Alexandria, VA, newsgroup [Proposal] Date: 1995/09/15 Message-ID: <43cmpk$pva@clarknet.clark.net> X-Deja-AN: 110218878 references: <42kmet$b1n@clarknet.clark.net> <42t4dv$9as@clarknet.clark.net> <42v4qm$223@blaze.cs.jhu.edu> <cnordin.810754575@sowebo> <42vld1$i3h@clarknet.clark.net> <434toq$ft2@clarknet.clark.net> <43a2g2$7gs@chinstrap.penguin.net> <43cdcb$594@clarknet.clark.net> to: rothman@clark.net content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii organization: Clark Internet Services, Inc. mime-version: 1.0 newsgroups: dc.general,va.general,dc.config x-mailer: Mozilla 1.1N (Windows; I; 16bit)