Re: SCSI Zip drive

Article View: dc.org.linux-users

Article #3623

Back to dc.org.linux-users Previous Next

#3623

From: Michael Faurot
Date: Sat, 04 Nov 1995 00:00

18 lines
1463 bytes

William Herrin (herrin@why.com) wrote:
: In article <47d6ek$63a@news4.digex.net> Stephan Greene <sgreene@access.digex.net> writes:

: >Yes.  Syqyest's EZ-135 is an alternative.  I understand it is faster, and 
: >of the course, the capacity is nominal 35% more than the zip drive.

: Isn't the syquest also based on an IDE interface while the Zip is based on 
: SCSI? That has some implications if you want to transition between Linux on a 
: PC and other Unix platforms (such as Suns or HPs).

No experience with either device--but from the catalogs it appears
there's both an IDE and SCSI version of the Syquest with the SCSI
being more expensive.
-- 
+--------------------+----------------------------+--------------------------+
|   Michael Faurot   |  mfaurot@phzzzt.atww.org   |      I don't like        |
|   ------- ------   |                            |      lima beans!!        |
+--------------------+----------------------------+--------------------------+

Technical Details

Message-ID: <1995Nov4.191400.14276@phzzzt.atww.org>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail

References: <458rsc$d2i@news4.digex.net> <459abo$1i1@yage.tembel.org> <47d6ek$63a@news4.digex.net> <herrin.675.309B3252@why.com>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 11663c,d83727211581a8ea
X-Google-Attributes: gid11663c,public
From: mfaurot@phzzzt.atww.org (Michael Faurot)
Subject: Re: SCSI Zip drive
Date: 1995/11/04
Message-ID: <1995Nov4.191400.14276@phzzzt.atww.org>
X-Deja-AN: 118690620
references: <458rsc$d2i@news4.digex.net> <459abo$1i1@yage.tembel.org> <47d6ek$63a@news4.digex.net> <herrin.675.309B3252@why.com>
organization: ATWW
newsgroups: dc.org.linux-users

Reply to Parent Message