Article View: demon.ip.developers
Article #890Re: unread mail
From: Paul Carpenter
Date: Sun, 07 Jul 1996 00:00
Date: Sun, 07 Jul 1996 00:00
67 lines
3044 bytes
3044 bytes
chris@keris.demon.co.uk "Chris Croughton" writes:
-paul@pcserv.demon.co.uk "Paul Carpenter" wrote:
....
->From experience in particular with PCELM and that just counting lines
->starting with 'From ' gets screwed up by the text in the _body_ of the
->message!
-That text will not occur in the body of the message if you are receiving
-it with KA9Q. If you're using a different SMTP server then it might,
-you'll need to talk to the author of that package to find out what their
-mechanism is.
Does here, see below...
-(You're not using some ancient version of KA9Q, are you? There were
-problems with quoting lines in some several years back; I thought they
-were all to do with the dots, but it's possible that the "From " one was
-fixed at the same time.)
Now lets see, last downloaded and updated a few months ago with now using:-
Prog Reported File
Name version Date
-----------------------------------------
NET.EXE V2.16d 1-10-95
DIS.EXE V1.28 21-11-95
PCELM.EXE V1.10 22-11-95
Now I don't call that ancient..... Unless of course you know different?
->-There are lots of programs which hande mail fine with just the "From "
->-string (note, you have to match it at the start of the line, not
->Irrelevant to what was stated as ADDITIONAL unread messages appear
->which are 'From Somebody' because it has misinterpreted the headers!
-Not for me they don't.
->I am fully aware of these items of software and I was referring to
->paragraghs in the _body_ of the text STARTING with 'From .....'
-Which should not be there in the first place. What mail server are you
-using which is doing this?
See above
->Tell me how many of your message headers of RECEIVED emails do NOT start
->From xyz@isp.co.*......
->Received: ..........
-
-OK, you got me on that one. KA9Q does insert at least one "Received:"
-line...
....
As will the gateways along the line from the sender to final destination.
Or in one case I had ONE valid message got three fail replies because it
bounced around the same punt and mail-relay for two days causing too many
hops;)
--
Paul Carpenter | paul@pcserv.demon.co.uk
Consulting for General, Scientific, Industrial Computing & more..
email: listuser@pcserv.demon.co.uk - how to _use_ UK Consultants listings
email: consult@pcserv.demon.co.uk - to _join_ the UK Consultants listings
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<836744645snz@pcserv.demon.co.uk>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<303048688wnr@longevb.demon.co.uk> <Snews.960707.103325.chris.7886@keris.demon.co.uk>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 10bb05,74043d7991f5707b X-Google-Attributes: gid10bb05,public From: Paul Carpenter <paul@pcserv.demon.co.uk> Subject: Re: unread mail Date: 1996/07/07 Message-ID: <836744645snz@pcserv.demon.co.uk> X-Deja-AN: 164141089 x-nntp-posting-host: pcserv.demon.co.uk references: <303048688wnr@longevb.demon.co.uk> <Snews.960707.103325.chris.7886@keris.demon.co.uk> x-mail2news-path: pcserv.demon.co.uk organization: PC Services reply-to: paul@pcserv.demon.co.uk newsgroups: demon.ip.developers